Remarks On Anarchism

Society

If you meet someone new, the first three questions they ask you are 1) Where do you work? 2) Are you married? 3) Do you have children? Thus we become petrified of answering "no" to those three questions. Thus to avoid the embarrassment, we work, we get married and we have children. But here is another trick: stop meeting people and you won't be asked these questions that you are pressurized to answer.

I know it is cliched, but if the whole town thinks you are the nicest person around, you are doing something wrong.

"We have to create culture, don't watch TV, don't read magazines, don't even listen to NPR. Create your own roadshow. The nexus of space and time where you are now is the most immediate sector of your universe, and if you're worrying about Michael Jackson or Bill Clinton or somebody else, then you are disempowered, you're giving it all away to icons, icons which are maintained by an electronic media so that you want to dress like X or have lips like Y. This is shit-brained, this kind of thinking. That is all cultural diversion, and what is real is you and your friends and your associations, your highs, your orgasms, your hopes, your plans, your fears. And we are told 'no', we're unimportant, we're peripheral. 'Get a degree, get a job, get a this, get a that.' And then you're a player, you don't want to even play in that game. You want to reclaim your mind and get it out of the hands of the cultural engineers who want to turn you into a half-baked moron consuming all this trash that's being manufactured out of the bones of a dying world." - Terence McKenna

Quite ironic, in that in democratic countries, people are exercising their right to use their voice to silence someone else. In a healthy society, everyone has a voice, and that includes the person you despise.

The pressure for the male to have sex is immense, such that some men would rather be called a rapist than a virgin.

Perpetual motion exists; it is called society.

We are used to thinking that happiness is monetary. That once we have enough money to buy things and pay bills, then we can declare ourselves to be content. But there is another sociological aspect to how happy we determine ourselves to be and that is how our peers label us. Do they like us or do they not like us? Look at insecure people. They all want to be famous, for these two reasons: to have money and to make people adore them.

The stigmatization, or at least the threat of stigmatization, is the weapon used to keep society in check in democratic countries.

We are so quick to condemn in society. If only we were as quick to forgive.

You see the world from the perspective of how the economic system wishes you to see it. We are only as free as the system imposed upon us.

Even the most ardent right-wing individual would admit that the female's obsession with beauty is sociological. Society makes them obsessed. But you can apply a similar reasoning to what careers they choose or why there are fewer geniuses in their gender. It is sociological.

Destroy the group and you destroy the economic system. Purge, annihilate, vapourize society. Then the people in power will suffer. Society is how they sustain their wealth. People just cannot see this. They are content with so little that they don't care. It is the house, the neighbourhood, the city, the country, the continent, the globe, that must be destroyed, before any change will happen. As long as you have a population, you will have an economic system that is heavily skewed in favour of the minority. No revolution changes this.

As Huxley said, condition people on what happiness is and then give them enough money to try and attain it. Society is kept obedient so long as they are lost in the quest to be happy.