Laila
  • WpView
    Reads 6
  • WpVote
    Votes 1
  • WpPart
    Parts 1
WpMetadataReadOngoing<5 mins
WpMetadataNoticeLast published Thu, Nov 4, 2021
CHAPTER ONE LAW IN SOCIAL CONTEXT Abiola Sanni 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0.1 Definition of Legal Method The phrase 'legal method' is made up of two words -'legal' and 'method.' The word "method," in ordinary parlance, means a way of doing something or the quality of being well planned and 1 organized. The word "legal," which is an adjective, connotes something connected with the 2 law. Law operates in a society based on certain methods, that is, in accordance with certain processes, which must be properly understood for law to be put to best uses as an instrument of social control. Legal method can therefore be defined as an attempt to explain or analyse the 3 technique of 'thinking like a lawyer. In other words, it is learning to study the use and construction of legal rules, with a view to gaining insight into how law is planned and organized to achieve its objectives in a society. This task, like most tasks, is not as easy as it may seems. This is mainly because everyone approaches the subject of legal analysis from different perspectives based on their background and experiences. In that type of situation, the existence of multiplicity of approaches is inevitable. However, there are some areas of agreement or consensus in virtually all the legal analysis. According to a writer: "We cannot see the world as it is because we face it in a 'contaminated' vein. Namely our conceptual scheme (or a certain interpretation of it) and our biological constitution condition certain perspectives of the world and not others. When we face legal orders and legal method, we are placed in a kind of second world that is not possible without the first. Nevertheless, this normative world, let us say second world, has some special features, inter alia, the primacy of practical reason over theoretical reason ..."4 This chapter examines the different perspectives and the areas of convergence of jurists and authors on the definition, evolution, functions and objecti
All Rights Reserved
#363
thanks
WpChevronRight
Join the largest storytelling communityGet personalized story recommendations, save your favourites to your library, and comment and vote to grow your community.
Illustration

You may also like

  • The Summons
  • Justice Implication  {Complete}
  • The Dark Side of the Moon
  • Mated To The Dragon✔(COMPLETED)
  • My Last Breath (Book one of The Portal Series)
  • Warrior Luna
  • Opposite's Attract ᑕOᗰᑭᒪᗴTᗴᗪ✓
  • 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡✦𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐥 𝐱 𝐋𝐮 𝐒𝐢 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐠
  • Book 2- 1966 (Michael Jackson)
  • A Criminal In Another World

In the future, the government seems to have little to do with how criminals are judged and penalized-that's all done by the citizens instead. The police still investigate crimes and punish, after a short and on-the-spot trial, all criminals found guilty of any crimes lower than murder. Dozens of walking, dehumanized and lobotomized criminals stand as perfect examples to the citizenry against committing any crime. For the capital crime of murder, an Accuser must formally bring the charge against the one party they believe to be responsible. At random, a citizen must then fill his or her civic duty and judge the Accused, carrying out the punishment-an execution in the same manner of death that the victim suffered-by the end of the trial. There is no room for wrong judgement and, as history shows, once someone is Accused, execution is the kindest and most just answer. Raised to be a pacifist, the newest Judge cannot fathom the course of action he must take against a so-called criminal who seems to be the only person ever wrongfully Accused. Will the Judge make the right choice or make what everyone before him has said is the correct choice? Mature due to language and some scenes of violence.

More details
WpActionLinkContent Guidelines