Reasons for CDR Report Rejection

Reasons for CDR Report Rejection
Engineers Australia requires CDR reports as part of its visa application process, yet many CDR reports are rejected even with great effort and time invested. Recognizing common Reasons for CDR Report Rejection pitfalls will help ensure your report meets their high standards.
1. Word Count Requirement:
For CDR reports to be properly formulated and presented, an optimal word count range between 1,000-2,500 is ideal. Anything shorter may indicate insufficient experience, while too lengthy reports might include unnecessary details.
2. Poor Report Writing:
Engineers Australia provides a template that must be strictly adhered to; any deviation can lead to the rejection of an engineer's report.
3. Plagiarized Content:
Originality is of utmost importance, and any form of plagiarism - intentional or otherwise - results in immediate rejection from readers and is immediately ignored by search engines.
4. Ignoring MSA Booklet Guidelines:
The Migration Skills Assessment (MSA) booklet outlines essential criteria and format for conducting CDR examination. Failing to abide by these guidelines can result in rejection.
5. Career Episode Content:
Each career episode should highlight your contributions rather than those of a team while using multiple projects for multiple episodes is often mistaken as well.
6. False Documents:
Authenticity is of utmost importance; providing falsified or falsified documents may lead to rejection and could prevent future applications for visas or permits.
7. Improper Language:
Utilizing correct Australian English with clear grammar is vitally important when dealing with any communication issue while avoiding unnecessary jargon and maintaining professionalism.
8. Lack of Demonstration of Soft Skills:
Your report can benefit greatly from showing problem-solving abilities and conceptual understanding beyond technical skills alone.