This research article delves into the arrest of Ravi Lamichhane, a prominent political figure and leader of the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), examining the political motivations behind his detention and the broader implications for democracy in Nepal. Lamichhane's rise from a respected media personality to a political leader challenging the entrenched political elite has led to growing concerns about the misuse of legal and state institutions to suppress reformist figures. His arrest, widely seen as a politically motivated maneuver, underscores a dangerous trend in Nepal where opposition leaders face legal persecution under the guise of justice. Through an in-depth analysis of Lamichhane's case, this article explores the broader context of selective justice and the strategic use of the judiciary to neutralize political threats. Comparisons are drawn between similar international cases, including political suppression in Russia and Turkey, to highlight global parallels in the use of legal systems to stifle dissent. In addition, the article examines the role of media and civil society in shaping public perceptions of political suppression and discusses the implications of these tactics for Nepal's democratic evolution. The article argues that the continued targeting of political dissenters, including Lamichhane, signals a deep-rooted issue within Nepal's political landscape. The selective application of justice not only undermines the rule of law but also threatens to erode public trust in democratic processes. The study concludes by calling for judicial reforms, greater transparency, and the protection of opposition voices to safeguard Nepal's fragile democracy from further deterioration.