Thinking about dilemmatic and epistemological paradoxes leads me to reflect on the complexity of the choices we make and what we can really know. Dilemmatic paradoxes make me realize that, in many situations, our decisions are surrounded by dilemmas where no option is completely good or without consequences. It's as if, instead of simply choosing what is right or wrong, life challenges us to choose between the least bad, which always leaves me with a weight, as if there were no definitive answer.
Epistemological paradoxes, on the other hand, touch on an even more fundamental question: what do we really know? I often think that the search for knowledge is a journey full of uncertainty, where the more we try to understand, the more we realize the limitations of what we can know absolutely. This creates a disconcerting feeling, as if we were always on the verge of discovering something important, but without ever achieving complete certainty.
Together, these paradoxes make me question the very nature of our choices and knowledge. Can we really make decisions without being trapped in doubt and contradiction? Or is it that, deep down, we are all navigating a sea of uncertainty, trying to find meaning in a world that, no matter how hard we try to understand it, we never fully grasp?
When someone dies mysteriously during a Psych experiment, Rhiannon becomes enmeshed in a conspiracy that includes both the survivors and the killer.
*****
Short on cash, Rhiannon Ford signs up to take part in a social psychology experiment based on group think. But when a participant dies under mysterious circumstances, and the story surrounding that death seems mired in conflicting lies, she's quickly drawn into a web of conspiracies that merge urban legends, rivalries, and the very psychological principle the test was about. When everyone is lying, how can Rhiannon find the truth?
*****
[[word count: 100,000-150,000 words]]