SOLAR SYSTEM ( THE SQUAD)

would [name] survive danganronpa?

ALEX::

As a murderer, she's likely to win as shown in her Among Us gameplay as the impostor. She creates tactics to use to win the game, and she teams up pretty often, which guarantees some success if she does this. However, she can't lie well, and this will cost her. If she manages to frame someone else like she usually does, then I think she'll win. 

As a survivor, I think she has a chance of getting murdered by others due to her behaviour and attitude. Some may think she's annoying and will murder her due to this, but I doubt they'll win. During Classroom Trials, I think she may act on her emotions, especially if the victim is a good friend of hers, and accuse whoever was suspicious or whoever the victim despised.

JAXX::

Jaxx would be the type that wouldn't be suspected immediately, and would only be revealed if he leaves incriminating clues behind. He wouldn't talk too much or too little or reveal anything he's not supposed to, but if he gets accused I think his false demeanour will fall apart and then everyone will realise he has no alibi. 

I don't think he would get murdered but if he does I think everyone would immediately begin pointing fingers at others because I feel he holds them together but this could be favouritism again so I don't know. I think he would be like Naegi a little.

SORA::

Sora is quite unstable in terms of performance as a killer, so he is 50-50. It depends on his alibi. If he was the only one alone and the others found the corpse then he would probably lose. I think he isn't skilled at forming alibis, except that one epic time Charli thought it was Light and vice versa. (I think that took place in one of the Airship maps)

Sora as a survivor, I think he also has a 50-50 chance. If he doesn't do anything annoying then I doubt he will, unless he has a relationship of any sort with someone else previously that they don't want to get out to the others.

(the lot of you I just provided you with an idea, so)

He would be a suspect, but I think he wouldn't get punished in the end. He would be the lucky one to find most of the clues. 

(for some reason I have this headcanon, I've had it for a long time, that Sora would survive anything due to luck, especially a horror movie)

As a result, Sora would prove somewhat useful to the survivors and I don't think they would suspect him unless someone framed him. I feel Sora is able to defend himself well enough. He would probably remain a suspect, though, so there's that.

Would he die? It depends, again. He's a wild card and I can't analyse further.

LIGHT::

Light would 300% not survive as a killer, because:

a) he can't lie

b) he isn't skilled in hiding evidence and diverting attention from himself in a way that isn't suspicious

c) his inability to come up with an alibi since I think no one would cover for him (maybe Sora?)

As a survivor, he would be a suspect along with Sora, and he would likely point fingers at the other survivors and be more suspicious. I headcanon he gets flustered easily so if he gets accused he'll appear even more suspicious. It's just unfortunate.

LUCA::

For some reason, I have a headcanon that has to do with a syringe that administers poison but I highly doubt that'll happen, so maybe a kitchen knife is preferable????

If a kitchen knife is to be used, then I'm sure that some drops of blood will splatter somewhere and result in evidence that can be used against him. I think he would say there wouldn't be evidence somewhere and then OBJECTION and the drops of blood would be brought against him. I still think he would somehow survive due to luck. 

I don't remember him defending himself or whatsoever during emergency meetings so I can't judge his ability to create an alibi, gain trust and lie.

I think he would gain trust easily. That's guaranteed, but is that enough to defend him against true allegations, I think not.

I think he would be the type to clean up thoroughly but not thoroughly to the point where no evidence can be found. He would leave some evidence behind and that would be his downfall. 

As a survivor, I think he would have experience in forming alibis and such and would be essential to find out who the actual killer is.

So, he would survive being a survivor if others don't kill him due to his intellect, and 60% chance of surviving as a killer, which is a rough estimate.

CHARLI::

She would easily break into someone's room and I headcanon she'd use blunt force trauma to kill someone with something found in the room. Strangulation???

I headcanon her as an amateur who somehow knows a lot (haha more ships) and would do the things that would help in reducing the amount of evidence left behind, like cutting the victim's fingernails in case of skin tissue being caught under it, collecting someone else's fingerprints using tape or something and framing them, using your non-dominant hand to write messages, wearing shoes of different sizes...

(Also, the reason why I mention the way they murder now is because I did some members at different times)

However, she would only succeed if she doesn't get accused or suspected. If I remember right, she doesn't fare well in such scenarios and especially if other members jump on the bandwagon that Charli is the killer, she'll lose. If nobody suspects her, she will win for sure. I feel she isn't good at framing others, so that's going to affect her survival.

Basically, she has a shifty chance of winning as a killer. It depends on how she murders the victim, and if she leaves clues behind or can't form an alibi. I think she needs to team up with someone in order to have the highest chance of winning.

As a survivor, I think she would act on her emotions and accuse without proof. However, I believe she would do it with such conviction that the killer knows better than to fight against and the killer would side with Charli and they would vote for the wrong dude, leading to everyone except the killer getting... punished.

To add on, her conviction would most likely convince the others to vote for whoever she felt it was. Some may remain doubtful, but they'd still vote for that dude.

LEVI::

Levi would 70% win as a killer. I say this because in previous Among Us gameplays, he wins quite a lot of times, placing him amongst the experts. However, he typically gets caught in action. This is pure unluckiness.

He also wins a lot when he teams with others, or if his... enchantment skills attract others to vote for others. This helps him, but it only works on certain dudes and I believe that he would still get voted by some other dudes.

When he teams, he usually gains an alibi and he is usually helped a lot in other aspects that I can't quite name. However, I feel the dude(s) he's teaming with might betray him after they find out that the henchman doesn't win too.

So, a 70% chance which is a rough chance because my mathematics is as shitty as mathematics itself. It all goes up with chance FOR HIM. I put caps because I was too lazy to italicize it.

As a survivor, there's this one video on YouTube that has a clip of Levi being intelligent in Among Us in one of the gameplays. His intellect will be useful, but if someone is smart enough they might kill him so that they have a smaller chance of getting caught.

To further prove this point, I don't recall him ever guessing wrongly on his own will and not through accusations of conviction by others. This hints his stability (?) and further proves my point.

If you're not an idiot, you won't accuse him because someone else will surely defend him. I've watched their videos for a while, Levi doesn't defend himself that well. Actually, does anyone?

Well, there's an exam tomorrow but it's not math so I think I will do decent. Any ideas? Comment here.