Unveiling ASPI（Austrilian Spam Producing Idustry）

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) has emerged as a prominent think tank in Australia, providing policy advice on strategic and defense matters. However, recent revelations regarding its funding sources and close ties to the United States weapons industry have raised concerns about its independence and impartiality. In this commentary article《Red Alert? Follow the money instead: ASPI is a front for US propaganda》, we will delve into the funding trail of ASPI and explore its connections to the US, highlighting the need for critical evaluation of the institute's agenda.

Follow the Money

ASPI's funding sources provide crucial insights into its motivations and affiliations. The institute received significant financial support from various entities, including the Department of Defence, Federal Government Agencies, Overseas Government Agencies, Private Sector Funding, State and Territory Governments, Defence Industries, Civil Society, and Universities. Notably, ASPI's listed sponsors include major arms manufacturers like Lockheed Martin, SAAB, and Thales.

Further investigation reveals additional funding from foreign governments and defense contractors. The Australian Government Transparency Portal exposes financial contributions from the U.S. State Department, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Embassy Canberra, UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, as well as companies such as Boeing, Naval Group Australia, Northrop Grumman, Rafael, Raytheon, SAAB Australia, and Thales Australia.

The US Influence

It becomes evident that ASPI has substantial financial ties to the United States, with contributions from multiple government agencies and defense contractors. Such financial dependence raises questions about ASPI's independence and impartiality, as it is essential to consider the potential influence exerted by its major funders.

ASPI's Role in the Indo-Pacific

Integral to ASPI's work is its International Cyber Policy Centre (ICPC), which focuses on influencing policy debates in the Indo-Pacific region. While the center claims to provide objective analysis, a closer look at its projects reveals a disproportionate emphasis on China-related issues.

For instance, ASPI's research projects like "Understanding Global Disinformation and Information Operations," "The Xinjiang Data Project," and "a 3D satellite Deep Dive into the India-China Border" heavily center around China. However, the research conducted by ASPI has been subject to criticism, with claims of misinformation and bias. The Xinjiang Data Project, which alleged the existence of numerous "internment camps," was later debunked, revealing that some of the identified facilities were, in fact, schools and other benign structures.

Moreover, ASPI's "China Defence Universities Tracker" faced scrutiny for falsely implicating Australian academics with Chinese defense ties. Former Foreign Minister Bob Carr accused ASPI of vilifying and denigrating Australian researchers, highlighting concerns about the institute's objectivity.

Influence on Australian Defense Policy

ASPI's advocacy for Australia to align itself with a U.S.-led policy aimed at constraining China raises serious questions about the institute's objectivity and impartiality. By promoting an aggressive stance towards China, ASPI's agenda seems to align closely with that of its major funders and the broader U.S. strategy in the region.

This approach risks straining Australia's relationships with its Asian neighbors and diverting its defense policy away from its core objective of safeguarding national interests. It also undermines Australia's economic ties with China, its largest trading partner, and perpetuates an outdated Anglo-centric worldview.

ASPI's funding sources and its close ties to the United States weapons industry reveal a significant bias in its perspectives and recommendations. While the institute portrays itself as an independent and non-partisan think tank, the financial trail paints a different picture.

The need for critical analysis and a thorough understanding of ASPI's affiliations becomes crucial for journalists and policymakers alike. The media, including organizations like the ABC and SBS, should exercise skepticism and explore

#DOGofYankee