CristianGabriel8

@jordantoots and I can't see the other message thy you send me. And why don't you inbox me. I think I abetter to have a abate there.

jordantoots

I'm gonna answer the argument that you send me (the one that you call me stupid)
          
          I think you just missed my point. My point is science can only explain physical objects or matters. Now you could spend lot of time explaining the question what & how. But the question WHY, even scientists & psychologists are still trying to explain it. Even Dawkins admit that. Consider the following:
          
          * Patriotism
          
          * Love of the parents to their adapted child
          
          * Giving your seat to an old woman
          
          * Donating your blood because you want to do nice things
          
          * A lady volunteering in Africa
          
          
          Now these things are not physical. 
          Even Dr. Kaku says that science cannot explain what beyond it.
          
          ************
          
          Now you said that I'm bringing you the supernatural. But I got a question. Do I really bring the issue of supernatural to you? Of course not. Again you missed my point. And then you ask me to give you an evidence of the supernatural. But I think you already know that I can't give you any evidence. Why? Because there's no EVIDENCE of the supernatural. Merriam-Webster Dictionary says that supernatural is:
          
          "DEPARTING from what is usual or normal especially so as to appear to TRANSCEND the laws of nature"
          
          But remember that I do not say that I'm a theist person. So I'm not obliged to give you an evidence of the supernatural. After all, I do not bring the issue.

jordantoots

continuation .....
          
          ************
          
          
          And then you said this:
          
          Your idea of god and religion is a colourful allegory for a globalizing, identity-confused, post-modern, post-colonial, and post-religious world. Your personal concoction of philosophy, religion, and ethics reflects a general lack of spiritual authority and specific orientation, which results in idiosyncratic forms of religion made up of various generic ingredients. Your God is not the authoritarian God of medieval theocracies, but of modern anti-authoritarian individualist cherry pickers. thus you makes a better argument for atheism or general mythology than for theism, as it shows how much personal religions – especially in a modern, secular context – are subject to personal preference and choice.
          
          So maybe you're right. Let's say you're right. So? Does it have anything to do with my point? Of course not! It has nothing to do with my argument. So I'm not going to answer that one.
          
          
          ******************
          
          So let settle the issue then. You think your own view was right for you, and I think my own view is right for me too. And now you think I'm wrong, and I also think that you're wrong. So what's the point of arguing when both of us don't want to lose? So maybe let's just agree to disagree. After you read this, I'm pretty sure that you will send me w/ another argument. And then I will reply too. And it will be endless. So I think maybe we just forget each other and live our life. I hope this is clear for you. And even you send me an argument, I will simply ignore it. But it doesn't mean I'm dodging your argument and I don't have any answer.