data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4add/a4addca6bb8d17bef12d5ee8c89132f5fa3a745a" alt=""
Deku_Helixy
VENT! I hate my school so much. and yes its about the position paper again. My teacher told me and my friends that our papers are to good to be written by us, stating that our writing is vastly different to the ones that they MADE us do in SCHOOL. And thats why it has to be made with Ai. ... They made us do it at HOME for a WHOLE WEEK. Of course its going to be different because we had more time to write about it plus the information we could have searched up to do it as well that isnt in the books that was given to us. And the reason our writing was so different to the ones that they made us do in School is because they gave us barely anytime to write it and the information/research we could do was only in the books that was given to us which doesn't have all the information we needed. Schools and the Teachers need to know that if a student has more time to do something, the quality is going to be different. I mean I spent 3 WHOLE days working on it, my friend worked on it for 2 DAYS and my other friend who was absent for half the week TOOK 1 WHOLE WEEK to write it. And they say our papers are Ai because of the quality. Then they said another thing about it saying the starting point and conclusion don't add up and that putting numbers on it was an indicator on Ai. ???? The paper was about "How should (my countries name) legalize Divorce?". There are numbers there to tell you that there are multiple ways on how to handle it or or simple things that can help along with explaining why. The conclusion has nothing to do with the start as its the inside that the conclusion builds on as its just a summary of the whole position paper. Logic on how they thing they can spot Ai generated paper is crazy. But im pissed about it as thats a whole lot of effort and grade they threw away as Ai generated paper. Even Tho Its Not