HistoricalLove

@HistoricalLove woah....*googly eyes* 
            Waiting eagerly for your transformative return 

@WattpadHistoricalRomance It's a hard question because once you've watched the adaptation, you can't imagine the characters different from the actors, but once you've read the book, you can't picture the characters different than what you imagined lol

@WattpadHistoricalRomance I usually prefer reading a book before seeing an adaptation, but for historical romances I tend to like seeing the adaptation first. I like looking at the pretty costumes :D

@WattpadHistoricalRomance People's preferences regarding whether to read the book first or watch the adaptation vary. Some readers prefer to immerse themselves in the original story by reading the book first, allowing them to form their own mental images and interpretations of the characters and events. Others enjoy watching the adaptation first, as it provides a visual representation and can enhance their understanding and appreciation of the source material when they read the book afterward.
            
            Historical romance books adapted into movies or TV shows often spark discussions among fans about the faithfulness of the adaptation to the original story, the casting choices, and the overall interpretation of the narrative. Some may have strong opinions about whether the adaptation captured the essence of the book.
            
            Ultimately, whether to read the book first or watch the adaptation first is a personal choice. It depends on individual preferences, the desire for a specific experience, and whether one values the surprise of discovering the story through reading or the visual elements brought to life on screen.

@WattpadHistoricalRomance here in the Philippines, Writing love notes or letters expressing affection is a heartfelt tradition. Some people take the time to write personalized messages to their loved ones, sharing their feelings and appreciation.

Spotting couples sitting lovingly on a wall as they overlook the beautiful scene in front of them, and then cleverly sneaking up behind them to push them off. 
            
            Kidding. Just kidding. 
            
            
            
            For me, a good morning kiss is a must, followed by wearing something red or pink. If one receives roses then, well, that’s makes for a perfect day. 
            

If the prevalent historical attitude is going to offend readers and sink sympathy for a character, I understand the need to change it, but there needs to be an in-universe reason. If a character is open-minded about other cultures, it should be because they know (or get to know) people from other cultures. But I think this should be done sparingly. It’s annoying to have all the sympathetic characters “just know” things like the length of WW1, despite what all the people around them are saying. On the other extreme, it bugged me in The Difference Engine when the MC’s misogynist, colonial attitudes were just not addressed. The story should speak to a modern audience, but it’s ok for the MCs to be wrong, and that could even be a chance for character growth. 

@WattpadHistoricalRomance In historical romance novels, I find the portrayal of societal norms and values from the past to be both fascinating and challenging. While it adds authenticity to the setting, it sometimes requires a nuanced approach to avoid romanticizing aspects that might be considered problematic today. Navigating through these differences enriches the narrative, offering a glimpse into the complexities of historical relationships. It doesn't necessarily impact my enjoyment; instead, it adds layers to the storytelling, prompting reflection on the evolution of societal norms over time.