IneptAtMath

@writers_ alright! I'm checking it out now! :D

CigarettesAndCorsets

Oh don't worry, no rush. I just really love it when I get reviews that help me improve rather than just sing my praises (although I must admit I like praise lol). And yes, I try to include as many historically accurate facts as possible (if you pay attention to my descriptions of the Ripper's victims, you'll see they match the autopsy reports from 1888 doctors) however, yes, sometimes I have to add/subtract/shift certain aspects for dramatic effect. I promise I try to do it in good taste :p

IneptAtMath

@CigarettesAndCorsets Sure! Would love too but I need to critique a few other pieces of writing first. So it will take a while unfortunately. That's fantastic! Your even applying the Victorian age's grammar style to your writing. Dang, dedication to your story right there. :) I'd also like to add that your research on Jack the Ripper is spot on. I watched a documentary about this enigma and the first he killed was indeed a prostitute called Polly. I'd like to applaud you for your efforts in preserving the truths of history. :) But, I'm sure some things will be twisted to make your story more interesting than history's already-super-interesting story of Jack the Ripper. 

CigarettesAndCorsets

Hi! Thanks for your review, I'm glad you liked the Prologue :) I know comma placement is a weakness of mine, and I'm working on changing that through some advanced writing classes. Prior grammar is boring, but necessary. However, the double negatives and other terrible grammar in some of the chapters is intentional, used to represent the uneducated class of Victorian London. Im glad someone actually took the time to critique me since it helps me grow as a writer. If you want to critique future chapters, feel free :D