Jhanvi Kumar

This is my version about two players of Indian cricket. If not interested, then avoid reading. I am not interested in reading some curses with how Karma turned back on Rohit as the board did same thing with him, what they did with Virat. Or how powerful/good a coach is that under whom only performance matters and big names are also not guaranteed position. 
          Rohit and Virat, 
          I don't know till when you will play or till when you will survive. The choice of words is definitely coming after reading about Agarkar's words (non commital). I don't know what the future holds for both of you but I wanted you to score 10,000 runs (not possible now) and ODI worldcup (may be not possible). Not that it will make you a legend or great player but it is something of which you wanted.
          Virat, I loved you game and your energy on ground. I liked the thing that when everything was about praises and all, you happily accepted, when things turned around then you accepted them too. When the world was all about Kohli, Kohli, you accepted. But when it turned around and became about Kohlism because of stupid ego battle between you and board, you accepted that too. Not many have that power and that makes you special. 
          Rohit, maybe the call with captaincy was inevitable. I am happy that last match you played as captain was CT Final 2025. Ending captaincy with ICC trophy is something I will cherish. Back in 2014-15, if someone had said that you would lead India in all three formats, then I would have laughed. 
          I don't know till when you two are in the scheme of the board, I will enjoy your game till the time you both are there.

What's wrong with us as fans? We are happy because Indian Players has not shaked hand with Pakistan Players? Your team is playing a tournament that was supposed to be hosted in India on name of inclusiveness. Pakistan with whom you have security concerns boycotted hockey Asia cup on name of security and then you are asking will they boycott hockey WC too. Just accept your diplomacy failed. You don't want to  give reasons why you suddenly decided for ceasefire. If anyone ask questions about airstrike/ War, you call them names, "supporters of Pakistan". Though no one have answers to questions raised by opposition or about security lapse. Surya spoke about crediting win against Pakistan to armed forces. Indian journalist writing it this win as Operation Sindoor 2.0. what IF Indian team lost the match? It was cricket match and should be treated as such. There were some actions from Pakistan players that should have been replied and you replied. 
          If you want to write about war/ airstrike, write about armed forces, write about families who lost their loved ones. You can write about problems faced by people during blackouts or war and their solution.
          There is difference between dedicating a win to forces and calling it second part of operation, naming players as missiles Brahmos, S100.

Anyone here knows how to mute words on SM? So that posts related to those words don't come to your knowledge.

Thank you Ashwin for interview.
          Now I want to go back in his tenure.