Titan-682
Link to CommentCode of ConductWattpad Safety Portal
@Life_Riderthe1 Here is the link to the Godzilla IDW cosmology https://www.wattpad.com/story/357402373?utm_source=ios&utm_medium=link&utm_content=story_info&wp_page=story_details&wp_uname=Titan-682
Life_Riderthe1
@Life_Riderthe1 imma keep going though all author statements and outside media are null and void. so so far its 2-A. seems alright. "We have The Grade, a dimension that transcends time and space and is described as a plane of existence superior to reality, to the point that the implied destruction of the past for the multiverse was considered inconsequential to it." the scan they provide literally never says that lol. and this also isn't outer so its kinda of like weird to argue this. well inconsequential * 0 is still 4d.and being on a different plane of existence then reality also doesn't prove even Low 1-C. so "Where both Heaven and Hell transcend the entire multiverse, not only on a spatial level, but also on a mathematical and possibly conceptual level. " why do they end it off with a NLF? none of the scans they showed says this. they also appealed to possibility right there. This is my issue with powerscalers is that they think "oh but you can argue X" no one cares if you can argue X. this is why powerscalers get clowned on in the community cause of allowing said logic. for one none of the scans say anything like transvestic, or beyond the thing from where space is cut from. math is inherently not impressive unless you are still living in 2014 when vsb wanted to stop darkseid from one shotting all the math verses. and what do they mean "Conceptual level" nothing provided proves hell is just beyond the thing from where concepts are cut from, none of the scans even mentions conceptual nature. Based off the doc even with steelmanning it any person who reads it should come to the same conclusion its only 2-A and even then you probably could argue like "prove timelines have 4 spatial vectors to them" and say they kept repeating high 3-A stuff and random stuff that's never been impressive.
•
Reply
Life_Riderthe1
@Titan-682 this is just my thoughts. First scan dismissed via dota. the second bit appeals to possibility the third doesn't mean anything. the first two scans if you give it the infinite sized stuff would only make it high 3-A and that based off the first two scans never actually says its infinite they are kinda of just appealing to possibility. 5. "If these three are anything to go by the rest of the realms and voids etc. should be infinite in size meaning we have at least eight infinite-sized realms (possibly ten) that potentially exist outside of time or beyond time." again appealing to possibility and none of the scans say outside of time or beyond time not like that be all that impressive but again for sake (I am just going off provided) So i'll steelman them again lets give them 8 * high universal as so far nothing proves the 4th vector they are just saying these dimensions are infinite in size. Not even seeing them argue if they are Universes but seemingly just arguing they are realms/dimensions so 8 - 10 high universal so far. 6, "Now let's talk about the cosmology of the multiverse that encompasses the comics." wheres the proof of this from the comic dismissed via hitchenz razor then it once again appeals to possibility those other comics are canon. but lets steelman them again and ignore logical fallacies ig. so far still high 3-A 7. high 3-A still never actually moves past Uni+, uses crossverse scaling which any proper powerscaler will tell you is inherently dubious. but lets give these timelines each Uni+ and assume these are supposdly impressive so lets see so lets just give it Low 2-C and if its infinite that be 2-A but thats me steelmaning it and not just properly reading what they are trying to assert here. uses another author scan which is dismissed dota. i am not sure where they are getting those idw stuff from but if we keeping it logically sound no one worth any salt would use those to actually powerscale as we aren't scaling the brain.
•
Reply