Sarvabhutaaya

tysm for 100 reads!! <333

Alpha__She__Wolf

Have you ever asked yourself how  can i get more attention on my books? 
          
          More reads, votes, and comments? 
          
          Well, your wish is my command!
          
           Introducing my review shop where you can get book reviews and honest, constructive criticism and feedback and connect with other writers along the way 
          
           Just fill out a form and we'll go from there. 
          
          Have a wonderful day!
          
          https://www.wattpad.com/story/367521393?utm_source=android&utm_medium=link&utm_content=share_writing&wp_page=create&wp_uname=The__Tourtured__Poet

Karna1950

@Sarvabhutaaya did'nt they made her tell me who shares matrimonial realtionship with sister in law why didn't they resist it why they agreed to it was just mistake of words by so great kunti. Seriously nobody is no one's slave unless one let him to be didn't yudhishitra know many dharma gyan and...... other version of mahabharata  bring it on i will question you at that time don't hide.... seriously which version of mahabharata you want to say because the points clarrified  by me in above comments to author similar to all mahabharata for example:- lets consider that kauravs were bad and pandavs where good then also which mahabharata doesn't contain eklavaya's gurudakshina, draupadi to be shared, kandavprasth forest with animals and nishad to be burned, in childhood bhima bullying kauravs, biased kuru elders, staking of their wife by husband, yudhishitra telling his brothers bad quality in final exile forgot his, waging war for the result of their own foolishness.... now diffuse these with valid and resonable defence....

Karna1950

@Sarvabhutaaya Krishna stand in real mahabharata was netural not supporting any side. He wanted to see whether pandavs recognise their mistake and do good things after war or not since they claim better than kauravs
• Reply

Karna1950

@Sarvabhutaaya that's what iam saying both kauravs and pandavs were equally bad and good. Now Krishna didn't persuade the pandavs to share the wife god won't give such pain and shame to a person he is kind. He just waited there and saw the reactions and decisions of the both draupadi and pandavs. Krishna himself said that he does not support such marriage but pandavs more importantly yudhishitra cannot break mothers words.. god doesn't control our destiny he shows us the path and choices we are to be decides which choice and anf path we take we are responsible for our own karma not god. He gave us brain, mind and other six senses to act freely not becoming the contoller.... seriously people view lord Krishna as human nowdays not as god. There difference between god Krishna and human krishna. Human krishna is what is presented in tv and books of present mahabharata. God Krishna is the person who is not bound by rules who supports freedom, equality and justice more important god stands with truth. Truth is god.
• Reply

Sarvabhutaaya

@Karna1950 Ok  so in that very comment I had specified that no one in Mahabharat can be painted as white or black. Kauravas were not all bad an neither were the Pandavas. In Mahabharata any person can clearly see that all of them are grey. If they did not split Draupadi then Mahabharata would not have happened, everything that happened in the text of Mahabharatha happened for a reason and teaches us valuable lessons. Krishna was truly the one controlling most decisions (except the staking of Draupadi) of Pandavas. You must admit that Kauravas had flaws. Now if we remember it was Krishna's persuasion that made Draupadi marry all 5 Pandavas.
• Reply