SilviaKrpatova

@DomiSotto Sounds good. It had been so troublesome in formatting for me, it became too time-consuming. I should give it another try, maybe they updated the app since I last checked. 

@donnaf1828 Same. It's strange and wrong and kind of weird.

@SilviaKrpatova  Hmm… With your literary writing style, historical fiction experience, and knowledge of the classics, perhaps you should take this as a writing prompt? Mary Shelly discovers she is an automaton — I would read that story.

@wdhenning Haha, you just keep coming up with great short concepts for books! 
          
          It seems that at this point there's no way of knowing, except for those books written before it became so widely used. It's about 'feelings' and 'guessing' and 'observing patterns'. As we can see, it can go crazily wrong. 

@DomiSotto I agree with this entirely. I write for fun, for the pleasure it brings me. I have no hopes or dreams of becoming published. I've simply seen too many of those who want to get (self) published discussing this problem lately and I can see their point too.

@DomiSotto Yes. It just made me wonder how many of our, purely human written stories, it would flag.

Passages from Mary Shelley's 1818 novel Frankenstein have flagged as 100% AI-generated when run through certain commercial AI detection tools. In March 2026, viral social media posts highlighted that the famous opening text of Chapter 5—where Victor Frankenstein brings his creature to life—was flagged as entirely machine-written by detectors like QuillBot and GPTZero. 
          
          This viral phenomenon perfectly highlights the systemic flaws and unreliability of modern AI detectors.
          
          
          
          
          I've just come across this. Wow?

@XannaLurel That is interesting. It must be a regional thing after all.

@katiegoesmew I see :)

@Afterburner182  thanks