SilviaKrpatova

Did you know that Agatha Christie plotted her murder mysteries while eating apples in a large Victorian bathtub?
          	
          	I'll tell you more about this tomorrow. In the meantime, tell me, do you have any quirks for plotting your books or fighting the writers block?

marsaumell

@SilviaKrpatova When I get writer's block and put music on and jump and dance around the room. It always works for me!
Mag-reply

SilviaKrpatova

@XannaLurel Haha, even in this, we're very similar. We have a lot of things in common  :)
Mag-reply

SilviaKrpatova

Did you know that Agatha Christie plotted her murder mysteries while eating apples in a large Victorian bathtub?
          
          I'll tell you more about this tomorrow. In the meantime, tell me, do you have any quirks for plotting your books or fighting the writers block?

marsaumell

@SilviaKrpatova When I get writer's block and put music on and jump and dance around the room. It always works for me!
Mag-reply

SilviaKrpatova

@XannaLurel Haha, even in this, we're very similar. We have a lot of things in common  :)
Mag-reply

SilviaKrpatova

Strange but true—I, a historical romance lover both as a reader and a writer, had never heard of Georgette Heyer until a few months ago. And that was through someone who mentioned how Julia Quinn took inspiration from Heyer’s books to write her Bridgertons (a series of which I’ve only read the first book and, well, haven’t been tempted to read more so far).
          
          Authoress of over fifty books, Georgette Heyer is one of the best-known and best-loved historical novelists, making the Regency period her own. Her first novel, The Black Moth, published in 1921, was written at the age of nineteen to amuse her convalescent brother.
          
          This fast-paced, swashbuckling story, set around 1751, centres on Lord Jack Carstares, the rightful Earl of Wyncham, who lives as a highwayman after taking the blame for his younger brother Richard’s cheating at cards years earlier to protect the family honour.
          
          Heyer’s characteristic attention to period detail and authentic dialogue, which would later define the Regency romance genre she essentially invented, is present even in this early work. It is indeed an impressive debut.
          
          While I enjoyed this book—for its use of the ‘damsel in distress’ trope, and even more for how wonderfully it portrayed Jack’s love and respect, fully requited, for his mare Jenny—I can’t say it’s one of my favourites. The characters didn’t make me fall for them, and the plot felt a little exaggerated and incredible.
          
          However, I’ll definitely read some of Heyer’s later works.
          
          Have you read this book? Have you read anything else from this authoress? Let me know in the comments :)
          

SilviaKrpatova

@donnaf1828 I've read that Venetia and Grand Sophy are her best books, so I'll try those at some point :)
            I really like historical romance. 
Mag-reply

donnaf1828

@SilviaKrpatova Me too. It's also one of my favourite genres to write.
Mag-reply

donnaf1828

@SilviaKrpatova I've read quite a few of her books. Her settings in the time period are amazing, but I did find that she used the same damsel in distress theme often, so at times, I felt I was reading the same story with different reasons for the damsel to be in distress.  They are fun reads, though.
Mag-reply

SilviaKrpatova

Galápagos (1985) is one of Kurt Vonnegut’s most ambitious and darkly comedic novels. It combines his signature dry wit with a deep dive into evolutionary theory, questioning whether the human "big brain" is actually a biological mistake.
          
          The story is set in 1986, during a global financial collapse and a simultaneous outbreak of a virus that makes all human females infertile. The only survivors are a small, mismatched group of people stranded on the fictional island of Santa Rosalia in the Galápagos archipelago.
          ​Over the next one million years, these survivors become the ancestors of a new human race. Because they are isolated on an island where survival depends on catching fish rather than solving complex equations, they "de-evolve" into furry, seal-like creatures with flippers and much smaller brains.
          
          Vonnegut’s central argument is that the human brain is a "clumsy computer" that causes more harm than good. He suggests that our intelligence led to war, greed, and ecological disaster, whereas the "brainless" seal-people of the future are perfectly happy and peaceful.
          
          Galápagos is a masterclass in satire. It mocks the idea that humans are the "crown of creation" and suggests that if we want to survive as a species, we might actually be better off as simple, fish-eating mammals. It’s pessimistic about human nature but strangely optimistic about life’s ability to find a way forward—even if that way involves growing fur and losing the ability to speak.
          
          In Galápagos, Vonnegut uses the asterisk (*) as a literary device to mark a character who is destined to die within twenty-four hours. It serves as a haunting reminder of the narrator's million-year perspective—to a ghost, death is just a scheduled appointment. By telling you exactly who is about to die, Vonnegut removes the "thriller" element of the plot. He wants you to focus not on if they die, but on the absurdity of their lives and the random nature of survival.
          
          

SilviaKrpatova

@XannaLurel I also found it very interesting! And brave, like imagine taking something like this to your agent/publisher and get a deal... :)
            I definitely think it's worth reading. 
Mag-reply

XannaLurel

@SilviaKrpatova I've never read it. I think it's quite a pessimistic take, but interesting idea :D Though I think even pre-historical humans were quite violent, so brain isn't a problem here :D
Mag-reply

SilviaKrpatova

​"The main thing wrong with the world back then, there is no denying it, was that people's brains were much too big and and too full of tricks for their own good.
          ​It was a world where people were always thinking of things to do, and then doing them, and then wondering why in the world they had done them."
          
          Guess the book  :)

donnaf1828

@SilviaKrpatova I'm interested to see what you thought. Maybe you can sway me to read it. Hahaha.
Mag-reply

SilviaKrpatova

It's almost the ONC time of year again... Who's excited???

SilviaKrpatova

@preciouspearl20 If you find a prompt that tempts you, why not?
Mag-reply

preciouspearl20

@SilviaKrpatova Not sure if I should give a try, considering I left it in the middle last year.
Mag-reply