WeekendReader

@JennaMark @Tan_Trumps  IN BOARD COMMENTS ABOUT DAVID
          	
          	Nancy -- To correct -- PersonL wrote in her board comments that David DID think about leaving Emily and being w/ Ava. She wrote that he's a lawyer and would work through all scenarios. She then qualified that it wasn't super serious. In another comment -- she changes her mind and says David never thinks about being w/ Ava.
          	              I think we can no longer rely on her comments. She's always contradicting herself AND she's always putting her desires onto the book which are sometimes in direct contradiction to the book, itself. (A is "misguided" -- "never came in to be a mistress" -- but the therapy session chp -- and the rules chp -- both contradict this.) So -- that's why I've started clarifying when I'm undertaking an analysis based on the BOOK only. (Ignoring her comments.)
          	                  I think the Book reveals a man who has contemplated being w/ Ava post-divorce FOR SURE. I think it would be far too literal (and far too narrow) or a "read" to assume when he says that he's lost sleep running scenarios (in response to whether they are "not temporary") - that that answer wasn't to the question posed. And when David says he wants her in all ways -- it's not just sexual 7 mos in - and becomes a nuanced and powerful character insight. I think we can't ignore that he is also far more passionate and far more emotional toward Ava -\- and we can't lose the context that he is always picking Ava over Emily. I read David (based on the book) as absolutely having considered his life w/ Ava if he's dumped. He doesn't picture himself alone.
          	             But - David doesn't want to be dumped. HE wants both. As much as he's thinking about winding the 2 of them down - he's still making sure they work side/side - he's just committed them going long-term to Boston together a lot - and he doesn't answer that they won't be together. The closest we got was him saying let's fck this weekend and not think about anything else.

JennaMark

@WeekendReader No Comment
          
          I’m reading a Jona story, and the betrayed wife has been dragging out the divorce for two years. He already agreed to giving her half his billion-dollar fortune and six properties. She’s a socialite with no children, married 8 years. He lost his entire family by age 19.
          
          So in the latest chapter, the scorned wife is claiming he sell something his mother left him, because she wants him to suffer.
          
          “I need you to lose something you can’t replace. … You can call it punishment. Perhaps it is. But what I want is for you to know what it feels like to not get the one thing you want. Because you never have. Not once in your life.”
          
          There’s several more paragraphs of her talking about how he needs to understand how he’s hurt her and he must pay.
          
          So I dared to comment “Unpopular opinion but she lost my sympathy in this chapter.” I called her malicious.
          
          My comments were that he already knew what it was like to not have what he wanted… he lost his entire family and was alone before age 20. And her deliberately going after the one thing she KNEW his mother left him was a textbook example of being malicious. It’s literally the definition of the word to be deliberately harmful or spiteful.
          
          Of course he’s wrong for falling in love with someone else and filing for divorce. (He stayed in their apt for months and months because the wife threatened to kill herself if he moved out. So she’s been manipulative for the 2+ years of this battle.)
          
          Needless to say, responses to my comments have gone from you’re totally wrong to call her malicious (I am not) to I am a terrible person for my take.
          
          I should know better than to comment. Clearly I was having an insane moment.
          
          Words having meaning, and I generally try to be very deliberate in my word choices. People get so caught up in sympathy, they stop reading intent. In this case, her stated intent was for him to feel pain. I didn’t read between the lines — those were her lines! 
          
          No more commenting for me!

WeekendReader

@JennaMark It's time for me to return to Jona. I'll add Chronicles of Obsession to my rotation. I find I'm hating a lot of the female protagonists lately -- to the point I'm beginning to "get" why those bullies on the WP version of S&R thought I was a sexist MALE reader. Damn - maybe I am?! lol.
                       But, I even posted negatively toward Raleigh in Abandoned the other day. I deleted 1 comment (where I was wrong on re-read) -- but I left in my original comment that questioned how come she's such a taker and not a giver -- and assumed that this is "anger" because it's, otherwise, the behavior of an unkind and selfish person who takes advantage of her position of power (with groveling Ledger). I didn't phrase it so harshly -- as I don't want to insult -- but I said it. I haven't had anyone really push back negatively (probably because GroveltoHEA has nicer readers) -- but I don't like the wronged woman taking advantage of her position just because she can. So - I'm SURE I'm going to hate the Chronicles female, too, if you do. I'm happy to hate right along with you - hahahaha.
                         Talk to you soon.
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader No Comment / The Pain of Keeping Quiet
            
            I wish you were reading this Jona story with me (it’s called Chronicles of Obsession) because I wish you could hate one of the female main characters with me, or tell me how I’m reading it all wrong.
            
            Commenters LOVE her and I think she’s a cold, manipulative, smug, self-absorbed witch. I really, really hate her. 
            
            One of the women is murdered and I am rooting so hard it’s her. I’ll jump in and do it myself, if necessary.
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader  Sorry, I mentally saved all my messages until I could type on the laptop. Didn't mean to inundate you. Respond when it's convenient and no rush or pressure!! Have a good week! 
          
          I injured my foot so it's back to the doctor this week. Now I've got an injury on my right leg and an injury on my left foot. So frustrating! Why did I not invest in Johnson & Johnson gauze years ago?! I'd be making an absolute killing right now. I could be shopping where David does!!! ;)

WeekendReader

@JennaMark  OMG - You Poor Thing!
            
            I will respond to your comments later -- but Monday is starting busy. But - I had to reach out to say that I'm sorry about your foot! AND - I didn't realize you had a leg injury, too. Right leg -- that must make driving a disaster. And, now your left foot, too, ohhhh - Nancy - I'm just sending a big hug through the internet to you, my friend. I hope you are bouncing back (literally) soon.
                     Separate short comment - Reed/Pixie -  what you reported is correct. Pixie things the ex-GF is dead -- she's not. AND, worse, G2HEA commented a couple times and indicated that Stark (1) will be a complete dick -- her characterization was that he is not "sweet at all", and (2) that it will devastate Pixie when she's dumped. So - I think we're going to hate Stark. The only thing that makes me waffle on Pixie being dumped is that the author ALSO indicated (by hint/implicatino) that Pixie will leave via one of the other guys flying her out. And, that doesn't make sense if Stark has dumped her - there's no need for her to sneak out...UNLESS Stark tells Pixie she'll be his homestead partner while he flies to Anchorage to have a relationship w/ his ex-GF. (But, that would be too stupid and cruel.) But - BOTTOM LINE - G2HEA was very clear that (1) Stark will be unkind to Pixie, and (2) the break up will be devastating to her. :-( 
                       As for Reed -- I'm bummed to hear Clementine is pregnant. He dumped her -- royally -- and listen to how he speaks when she dares to call him? Blocking her! The only reason he'll come back to her is b/c Raleigh is with Ledger. I don't like the 2 of them -- Clementine (like all women) deserve someone who respects them more than this.
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader G2H Abandoned, Stark & Pixie, Reed & ...
          
          Lately, GroveltoHEA is the only one not completely letting me down.
          
          I could not adore Pixie more! I do not know for sure, but the speculation is that Stark was involved/engaged? with another woman, and that relationship is over. Pixie took his comments to mean he LOST her like she passed away, but he did NOT mean that! So, the comments seem to indicate that the OW will come back and Stark may choose her. Him hurting Pixie when she's been so awesome is really painful. I think that story is probably going to be the worst.
          
          It seems like we're not THAT far away from Ledger and Raleigh getting back together... so I'm not sure we've got a ton of chapters left. That story does intersect also with Lupo and Skadi from Oz & Freya. So, I'm not sure if we resolve that inside Abandoned or not.
          
          Reed -- so the consensus seemed to be he becomes the H in his own book with Clementine. Sounds like he thought they were FWB and Clementine is now secretly pregnant and overheard him tell Raleigh how much he wanted to kiss her, called R Sweetheart, would wait for her, etc. etc. SO, if all that is true, Reed is going to have a serious grovel ahead of him.
          
          I just hope G2H comes through all the way on these stories. I'm very tired of writers letting the ball drop at the end. It's widespread lately between WP and KU and it's very disappointing.
          
          Maya.Alden has two new books this month, and while I was a huge / auto-buy fan, a few of her recent books have been a letdown. She is notorious lately for not having enough grovel, and I agree. No matter how deplorable, the women eventually put up with it. She's only been published for three years this year, and the books about halfway in seemed like the best. I could re-read them all the time. Lately, the books have leaned too pretentious or implausible in some way. I really hate to lose another auto-buy because I have so few left.

JennaMark

@WeekendReader @Tan_trumps  VIPER aka Viper's Regret
          
          Did you see that she published Viper on KU as Viper's Regret? Supposedly new scenes, 'stronger' characters, better setup for the next story...
          
          I downloaded it, but I just wasn't in the mood to start it. I DID search about Todd and she got rid of the attacking a plant stand scene!!! She changed it so it happened off-page with an MC member, not the main characters. I was shocked! That scene had not seemed like one of the problematic ones -- and it had reinforced the "inept Todd" persona more.
          
          Sometimes there are creative decisions that I just don't understand...
          
          Anyway, in case you check it out, I'd love to hear your feedback.

JennaMark

@WeekendReader @Tan_trumps Re S&R Kindle
            
            Thank you for your good wishes! Yes, my driving leg… it’s been awful. I appreciate the internet hug!! Anyway, I would love to read S&R together. I will close my eyes on some parts (LOL) but I really want their story! I’m very sad picturing Pixie being flown out by one of the other guys, that story is going to be brutal on the emotions!  Good luck with work!! :)
Reply

WeekendReader

@JennaMark @Tan_Trumps Sin & Ruin Kindle Release
            
            Nancy - I have much to say about your comments on the NPLH Author -- but I only have a few minutes and will start here. I'm glad to hear S&R is being released. I'll buy it, for sure. You want to read it together? (It is violent, though.) If so -- do we want to read in bursts -- like 10 chps a pop (and then discuss) -- or the whole 2 books (and then discuss)?
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader @Tan_trumps  Sin & Ruin
            
            Almost forgot, it looks like Sin & Ruin is getting closer to release on KU! I love this for two reasons... we not only get the story, we get it All At ONCE!
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader Is it Just Me?
          
          Hey, a bunch I want to write about but sneaking in a quick note for now...
          
          Not sure if you're reading True Blue by the NPLH author, but the couple is barely into the 'had a fight/broke up/allegedly still love each other" part and the story had the FMC kiss a stranger in a bar with thoughts of recreational sex in her mind. The estranged MMC of course witnesses it.
          
          I'm such a judgmental witch because I generally do not like the FMC to mess around even during a break, IF (a) they weren't cheated on, and (b) they claim to still madly love the MMC. If you love the MMC that much, just stay faithful to that. Like I said, I'm too much of a purist. At some point, I stop rooting for the reuniting couple. I don't think you need to smex around to claim it's about personal growth.  If you need that, go for it, but you're probably not really in love. 
          
          Now part 2 of my mixed-up mind today. I just read the Epilogue for a Patreon story and the married couple broke up by about chapter 2. So, they had a LONG haul back together. The MMC groveled, changed, self-reflected, did ALL the work to get back together. I was rooting for them all the way. Well, two chapters before the end the married couple FINALLY go on a date again. Kiss at date's end. Final chapter, they say I love you and say they're reunited. Epilogues 1 and 2 years out... happy family scenes. I love you. OKAY -- Where's the smexy stuff? I want a reunited couple to show some physical reconnection. It doesn't necessarily have to be graphic, but I want to know they aren't just platonic roommates now. I absolutely HATE when we don't see the HAPPY part after 40 chapters of disconnect. Does that make sense? I feel 100% disappointed and it ruins the ride. Why do romance authors not understand this? It seems like it should be a rule written in concrete. The greater the angst throughout, the higher the need for a visible, lovely, romantic HEA.
          
          Sorry, rant over!! Hope you're having a good day!

WeekendReader

@JennaMark  True Blue & Stuff
            
            I'm still catching up -- and will get back to you soon on your comments.
            
            In the meantime, I saw our True Blue author just posted another chapter - so over people's comments. I'm behind -- and will catch up (likely?) tomorrow. But, I'm going to comment about the relationship being too imbalanced (and Teddy being a simp). I won't be mean -- but I will speak up. I suspect I'll be unpopular. (Again.)
                        Separately - I bought Sin & Ruin Books 1 and 2. It was $376 the other day - lol. I posted to WP to the author letting her know. She didn't respond -- but it dropped to $3.99 -- so I bought. If you're getting, too, as I think you said you would - we should figure out how much to read/when-- or whether we just crash and read both before we discuss.  
                        As for Abandoned -- I hope we see Raleigh/Ledger be physical and have a steamy reunion -- and the purity of Sam & Tallulah isn't repeated. Honestly, Raleigh didn't even ask Ledger about who he killed or what he did after this last trip -- so....she's fine w/ what he does. I, on the other hand, would have bombarded him with 21 questions about who, why, how (to a multiple of 10). Anyway - since she's seemingly fine w/ him being an assassin - I'm hoping she just comes one night and crawls into his bed and screws his brains out. But, if this assassin acts like a monk, I'm going to be bummed at the end of this book.
                        In addition to wanting to see a lot of smexy fun w/ Ledger and Raleigh -- do you wonder about their background? I do. She was an orphan, apparently. I thought Ledger was, too, but Raleigh had no reaction when Ledger mentioned his dad -- so she obviously knows about him (and probably knows him). 
                           It's funny that I've gotten so into these off-grid characters in AK -- and that I've bought into the romance of it all when, in reality, I'd probably pay very good money NOT to go camping or anywhere without a flushable toilet. lol
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader True Blue
            
            Author posted a message she’s taking a break due to mean comments. It’s on WP.
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader No pressure here, I understand deadlines! I saw one person comment they felt Indie went too far, and of course the rebuttals were how he deserved it, etc. Honestly, it’s as if all the readers have forgotten all the chapters when he was catering to her (literally and figuratively) and that massive surprise party, etc. Anyway, wait till you’re ready to be pounced on to state your opinion! :) :) :) Good luck with work!
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader to you
          
          Hi S, I’m offline getting ready for Easter but wanted to wish you a very good weekend! X
          
          I’m not a home wrecker so I can sign this with an X! :)

WeekendReader

@JennaMark  BEFORE I FORGET...
            
            I loved your story about having this long science project conversation w/ a niece/nephew where you had NO IDEA who you were talking to - lol. (Something tells me all of those sets of twins can have a lot of fun playing pranks!)
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader Hi S! A BBQ sounds great. I envy you nicer weather. :) It was still too chilly for any outdoor activities today. My brother’s house is luckily large enough (and well designed for entertaining) so the indoor party was not too insane. So far, all of my siblings’ kids had twins (no explanations, just “luck”) so it becomes a very large crowd, yet a lot of fun. Hope you had a wonderful day!
Reply

WeekendReader

@JennaMark  Permissible Use of an Email Kissy X!
            
            Hahahaha! Your post made me laugh! YES - you can end your comment w/ an X unlike Ava and David. Happy Easter to you! Have a wonderful day. (My family is barbequing -- too old for Easter Baskets these days.) Enjoy your day and your family) xo  :-)
Reply

JennaMark

@Tan_trumps @WeekendReader Just realized…
          
          I just discovered Zarah blocked my account. Since I stopped commenting on her stories long ago, I can only presume she connected me on WP with my scathing reviews online? The names are not the same but maybe it was close enough? 
          
          Interesting she’d go to that much trouble but oh well.
          
          It’s funny, I keep coming across people who were burned by that author changing the endgame to the other guy…. And they’re still as disgusted by that bait & switch as I was. So they’re expressing appreciation or fear about who the Hero will be in new stories.

JennaMark

@WeekendReader Re Voice of a Mistress
            
            I’m going to address this more later but you’ve made such a good point that the author does not know how to write Book 2 because it’s made up vs. the autobiographical foundation in Book 1. Book 1 had all the known elements, situations, feelings. Book 2 is a phony story and it doesn’t hold up when the star voice isn’t in it. She cannot imagine what the wife thinks, etc.,  which is why we get this boring, time-wasting filler instead of an actual story! Looking at the 30 chapters so far, what do we bet the only ones with passion or dynamic energy feature Ava? They’re certainly the ones trying to engender sympathy for her… the store owner, etc. The bar scene is the only one where David was not portrayed as a worthless blob. What a scam.
Reply

WeekendReader

@WeekendReader @JennaMark -- AND ...IN THE NAME OF GOSSIP
            
            Also fortifying the idea that the author is Ava (vs just a Mistress telling the tale of another Mistress) -- is the book's description of Ava w/ her long wavy blond hair -- and the photo of her side profile at the beginning of the Chapter about the Firm Party. This photo -- of course -- looks identical to the Author's bio photo for this very book. Now -- did the Author pose as Ava in that Chapter Photo? Maybe. But, even if she didn't, there's no way she "missed" that the one visual of Ava posted looked identical to her own bio photo. No one would miss that. 
                     I also recall Ava describing herself in 7D as someone who likes to be in motion -- moving -- which was eerily similar to the way the Author described herself in her bio (using almost identical language). So, they are similar in personality, too. 
                     As for her son's father -- he is never mentioned as supporting the book (like her son) in the Author's comments. And, what wife would publish a book like this about her husband and his mistress and then tell the world about it (1) UNLESS it's for revenge, or (2) the H is really written as redeemed -- with a LOT focused on the wonderful qualities of his Wife (through the eyes of the H) to show why the H loves her more.
                      So - to YOUR point, N - yes - I think this duet was written by the Mistress (it's certainly in her voice), with Book 1 being probably semi-autobiographical as she claims -- she's just the Mistress, and not the Wife. And, I think Book 2 (post Ava break-up) is purely fiction -- which is why there's no voice (or story) of the Wife (not really), and the book is still trying to honor the Mistress as the more cherished of the two women.
Reply

WeekendReader

@JennaMark ITA - The Author's Voice
            
            Well, I have to give fair credit to T - who spotted it first. The writer IS Ava (or a Mistress). 
                  There are certain aspects of both books which 100% indicate that the voice of the Author is that of the discarded Mistress - because 100% of jilted wives would NEVER write the Mistress in the ways seen here. Just a few egs. pop to mind:
               1) David always choosing Ava -from booking the extended Boston weekend -- holding her hand after she bites - saying "don't you think I've thought about it" [in response to A/D being together full time]. This is the voice of the Mistress. 
                 1 qualification: HAD this been a book of a 60yo whose H is cheating w/ a 27yo (welcome to Hollywood) - THAT story would confront the sense of the W feeling like she can't compete physically - sure. But, THAT isn't THIS story. Emily is written as comment-worthy gorgeous (& young) - and, yet, she (as an author) writes over and over how everyone views Ava as the woman we're jealous of? (Voice of the Mistress; not the wife.)
               2) All the intimate details are ONLY relayed w/ Ava - almost none are shared w/ the wife. (Voice of the Mistress; not the wife.)
               3) David is shown as guilt-ridden, wanting to do the right thing - which is why he breaks up - but electrical currents shooting through him even now when he sees Ava. (Voice of the Mistress; not the wife.)
              4) The "walk away" scene - should have been Emily's - but it went to Ava in the bar. (Voice of the Mistress; not the wife.) 
              5) The Dwindling story in Book 2 - the real storyline ENDED w/ D/A's break-up. So - this indicates the author is struggling w/ the story post-break-up. The WIFE could write a TON in Book 2; the Mistress runs out of fodder.
               6) The FORGIVENESS and PRAISE of Ava would NEVER be written by the Wife like this. And the Wife wouldn't skip over things that matter to her (her book events? children? New Life? - Forgotten).
               There is no way this book was written by the jilted wife.
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader ITA - Includes cussing
          
          What in the world was that BS chapter of ITA?! David trying to cook something that sounds complicated when he NEVER cooks? WHY would you try something so stupid? Get out the Kraft Mac & Cheese and call it a day!
          
          And after waiting seven days for a new chapter, we get like 25 paragraphs of completely meaningless nothing! WHY? We could have had a therapy session… or a deeper conversation with the kids… or with the mom. And instead, we got pointless cooking lessons?
          
          And I saw your comment on the ridiculous ending portion when David tries to pretend he’s so cosmically aligned with Emily. The Emily he gave NO thought to for more than 7 months (and we know it was actually much longer than that). He didn’t have one decent conversation with Emily in over 40 chapters, and now he’s pretending they were soulmates. NOT BUYING IT. 
          
          We warned the author again and again and again that making David SO disconnected from Emily in book 1 would be a huge problem to overcome, and now here we are. Every single thing he thinks or says sounds utterly false and implausible because it’s not supported by history. There’s no foundation for any of it. 
          
          As someone commented, it’s more like he just wants what he can’t have. First that was Ava, and now it’s back to Emily.
          
          I know I’m bringing my own views in here and I apologize, but I wish he would’ve been showing some self-reflection in this chapter. He got another woman pregnant, and that was terminated. That should be cause for a look in the mirror. His selfish actions created that whole situation. Instead of even a moment of pause on his selfishness, we get David Failing in the Kitchen, Episode 1. I’m sorry, but what the F was that? 
          
          And that whole ending portion was just … I have no words. Him missing her — while he has done NOTHING for or with her for over five months — is just impossible to believe. Gosh, I’m so frustrated with how poorly this book is going. My expectations were NOT low enough!

WeekendReader

this message may be offensive
@JennaMark @TanTrumps ITA - AND NANCY KICKING ASS!
            
            Sorry for the late response, N. I had forgotten to check this page. 
            
            But - you have summed ITA w/ FIRE! (Love it.) And, I appreciate you almost cussing - because this book is a dumpster fire. It looks like most of the comments just don't buy David and Emily as a love-match either. The obsequious commenters are now taking offense at how most of the comments are negative. 
                     Well -that is because a few passing thoughts culled up in the name of David's internal monologue cannot serve as a shortcut for NOT WRITING THE STORY. And, the story has revealed David never thought about his wife. (That Ralph Lauren lunch is one I think of time and again - where Oliver, I'm sorry - Emily, is asking permission to go to her own book signing in NYC. David brags about how he makes the decisions, never thinks about supporting her -- for a HUGE career moment -and just thinks "that will be a super time to fck my GF"; he then acts like he's giving to charity for taking his own kids for  a 1/2 day on a Sunday - and makes out w/ his wife to prove he's in control - about 1 hour after making out w/ his true love on his slimy leather office sofa.) There is nothing good about this relationship.
                        To your point, he's done NOTHING to reconcile or grovel. He does just want what he can't have - but he's still not willing to put in any effort for Emily - and this is not a passive man. So, are readers supposed to be dumb?
                        And - yes - let's talk about ZERO self-reflection on knocking up his GF. I may have an unpopular opinion here b/c I wanted David not to feel remorse that Ava elected to end the pregnancy. I wanted reflection that shed light on his mistreatment of Emily - how he gave a pregnancy to someone before his wife -- and what that SAID about him as a man who gave away all the "rights" of Mrs. Harrington to Ava, and subordinated Emily for 10+ yrs. Instead -- all we got is David looking for a bowl and cooking.
Reply

JennaMark

@WeekendReader @Tan_trumps Revisiting an oldie
          
          I realize we've talked about this but... I need to revisit this topic after today's horrendous chapter of ITA. WHY, Why, why would you write yourself as an indecisive, passive, doormat? Incapable of travel with First Class Arrangements PRE-MADE for you?? A handsome billionaire waiting at the other end? Where is her backbone? Her PRIDE! She should be JUMPING at the chance to show her worthless cheating spouse that someone supports her and WANTS her company. (Yeah, I don't like the pregnancy part, but honestly, I felt FANTASTIC in that middle trimester.) 
          
          The ONLY part of this duet that has made sense was all the Affair chapters. THOSE were passionate, believable, a little uncomfortably perfect. The rest is like an endurance test in torture. David is a materialistic, elitist, arrogant, self-centered idiot. He only cares about himself, EVER.
          
          And E needs to turn in her female card. She is a blob. Afraid to go anywhere or do anything. No sense of adventure? No reaching for the stars -- she seems afraid of a blueberry. I just cannot BELIEVE how humiliating that chapter was. She could have reasonably hit back at him at least five different times and yet she lets him get away with every stupid, thoughtless remark.
          
          So I circle back to the question we've been asking... Why would you write yourself as a slug? A fraidy cat? A woman who can't make a decision?

WeekendReader

@JennaMark @Tan_Trumps Revisiting an Oldie
            
            To Nancy's Post:
            Hmmm....what in the WORLD could be the reason for writing a book where the FMC is supposed to be semi-autobiographical -- and, yet, written as a doormat  who is always less than the Mistress (less pretty, less smart, less interesting, less desired)...and what in the WORLD could be the reason for writing a book where the MMC is on the eve of divorce and still hasn't had a boombox moment (Say Anything) or tried to win his wife back -- moved 90 minutes way (60 w/ not traffic) -- but contemplates a return to his marriage as the right thing to do? Hmmmm. Who in the WORLD would write THAT book?
Reply

JennaMark

@Tan_trumps @WeekendReader — Hot — Judging a Book by its Cover
          
          I posted about the new Cornerstone book cover on the author’s WP conversation board… if you were inclined to back me up, thank you. I’d appreciate it, but absolutely no pressure. I took some creative license with the post. But someone else helped my case by just posting the cover was so CUTE. Unfortunately, the author agreed. But Cute, and right for the content, can be two separate things. She’d done a cover reveal on FB (no old/new testing that I noticed there) and a couple of people said it looked great. Yes, great artwork. For a book that covers death, a suicide attempt, a month in a mental health facility, a car accident, separation, etc. etc. NO. I realize it will likely make no difference, but I think authors need to think hard about what their covers are saying. Personally, I didn’t like old or new cover on What We Choose, a story about finding love and battling breast cancer. But these are all just my opinions. And I admit, a long background in marketing has made me very conscious of what an image says. Thanks, sorry to rant and ramble.

JennaMark

@Tan_trumps @WeekendReader Re Cornerstone Author Replied…
            
            You can see it on her page…
Reply