@Sahilvd237 i do agree with you that to some extent AI is helpful in learning. it can very well compile sources to learn from. however, in my personal studies, i've found it to be inaccurate. so i'd say that this is dependent on the subject of study. i think it would be fine up until standard 12, but after that at a degree level certainly not. even some language apps like duolingo aren't accurate with AI. it depends on the model used, really. chatgpt being such a general model ultimately hinders it at everything. moreover, though this is a personal experience, i'm fearful that i may forget how to be resourceful on my own? it's this strange sense of independence i want to maintain, that i can look by myself. that said, AI i don't think is inherently a bad thing. just specifically in creative spaces it can become, like you sad, an insult to the extent of human ability.
as far as translations go, i understand that your own work is absolutely fine to go off of. my only concern would be the accuracy of translation of meaning like you said, since i've noticed it can tend to oversimplify if you don't make sure to ask to translate directly. so the translation must be reviewed, almost humanised, if you like? that said, after this would be the concern that the AI actually takes your work indirectly, since in settings it can train on data you give it, so i would actually be wary of the opposite happening in this scenario. i think you can change the setting, but we don't really have a way of knowing exactly what they'll take and what they won't. as for you last point of people gaining views, i discussed with ASH a little while back and he introduced a theory that people write for money, message or catharsis, and i think it's quite accurate. all writing falls under this. what i will say is it seems the people who like to gain more views and followers tend to have a large following that might have a lower engaged reader to relaxed reader. that falls under personal preference.
