There’s a strange hypocrisy in parts of the Jikook fandom.
Some people sincerely believe their personal headcanon is the only “correct” version of Jimin — usually the one where he is always soft, submissive, voiceless, fragile, and dependent. And the moment someone writes him differently — strong, capable, masculine, emotionally complex, and equal to Jungkook — suddenly the writer becomes a “Jikook anti,” “homophobic,” or “problematic.”
Let me clarify something:
I don’t hate Jimin.
If anything, I love him enough to refuse reducing him to a stereotype.
Jimin is not just an aesthetic to project fantasies onto.
He is a man — one with strength, softness, discipline, fire, charm, grace, humor, and contradictions.
Writing him with depth is not hate — it’s respect.
And frankly, it’s ironic that the loudest accusations come from people whose reading lists consist of stories where Jimin is:
• humiliated
• infantilized
• bullied
• voiceless
• fetishized
• treated as less than Jungkook
Yet somehow that is acceptable, while writing him as confident, self-possessed, assertive, or masculine is offensive?
So I’ll ask once:
Who truly respects Jimin — the one who freezes him in one submissive trope, or the one who allows him complexity, dignity, power, duality, softness, and strength?
You are free to write your version.
I’m free to write mine.
But difference in interpretation is not an attack — unless you need conformity to feel right.
If my vision challenges your fantasy, that’s not my problem.
It’s proof that Jimin can’t be contained by one narrative — and never should be.
Anyone who reads my stories sees my love — not just for Jimin, but for Jikook themselves.
Yes, I’m no longer an ARMY, but I don’t attack anyone who is.
I write for Jimin. My love for him is real.
I dare you to say I hate Jimin again — and respectfully… fvck you! ☺️