as a follow-up message to my last one, i'd just like to let everyone know that i finished frankenstein a few weeks ago and it's very good.
there's something so timeless and perfect about the way old books are written. they weren't written to meet some kind of standard set by society or to appease readers, they were truly written for what the author wanted them to be, and you can tell while reading.
all the main characters have real flaws. there are villains yet grey areas and there aren't heros and antagonists so much as main characters. wuthering heights and frankenstein are both like this, because, really, who's supposed to be the hero in either of those stories? and who's supposed to be the villain?
i feel like we're always taught that this is the only good way to lay out a story, that you need a clear-cut protagonist and antagonist, which is why so many romances have exes and mean girls, just to spice things up, just to make sure they have that villain.
but, all you really need for a story to be worth telling is conflict. and conflict can come from anything. conflict doesn't need to be this white and black, good and bad, easily discernible difference, with the antagonist egging on the protagonist. it can be the protagonist becoming a monster or the antagonist being redeemable or the antagonist really only being that to the hero, but not to anyone else. it can be imperfections and insecurities and arguments and just anything. it can be grey. because the world, real life, is grey.
uh that's it. gonna go write something far less deep and/or thought-provoking than this off-brand discussion post