....The fact that you think saying we support it instead of being more neutral, means you have an opinion with assuming something out of somebody, completely blows my mind.
We don't support plaigarism, I read what chapters you had available when you had it up, I am the first person to chew somebody out for copying somebody elses work (I was a user long before I became a moderator, I love this community), I dont blame you for wanting to confront them, but you should have done it after a few more days and when that person published the book.
If you had a hunch you could have posted about this without the moderators part, you could have rallied many to help you in the comments, support you, but instead you chose to want to kick down the moderators for doing what we could do given the evidence and situation (it being so out of the blue, constant messages between you two, you both were getting heated, etc) at hand, it was so hard to keep track of everything and it was all so unorganized.
I don't disagree with what you overall meant, I know with plaigarism at play, its bound to get heated, but the moderator part is the only thing that didnt need to be in there.
You could have messaged us mods and told us personally we were entitled not to directly call us out in your post, because its not the truth, its how you feel, but you got the wrong idea, and its far from the truth.