In recent developments, President Prabowo has proposed new legislation concerning the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI), which could potentially grant the military increased benefits and influence. Critics argue that such measures might threaten free speech and democratic principles, as an empowered military could leverage its position to suppress dissent and control public discourse. Given Indonesia's past experiences with military dominance, these concerns are particularly alarming, underscoring the need for vigilance in preserving civilian oversight and protecting democratic freedoms.
Indonesia's experience also highlights the dangers of military control, particularly during the 1998 protests against Suharto’s regime. As demonstrations grew, the military responded with kidnappings and torture, with General Prabowo Subianto playing a key role. His special unit, Tim Mawar, was responsible for abducting and silencing activists. Even after Suharto’s fall, many military figures escaped justice and remained influential in politics, proving that military-backed authoritarianism doesn’t simply disappear overnight.
Globally, military regimes often lead to authoritarianism. While exact percentages vary, studies suggest that a significant majority of military-led governments have transitioned into authoritarian states. These regimes are often characterized by the suppression of political opposition, curtailment of civil liberties, and prolonged periods of undemocratic rule.
One of the first freedoms at risk under military-influenced governments is free speech. The ability to express opinions without fear of government retaliation is one of the simplest and most fundamental rights of any citizen. Accepting free speech is a sign of a healthy and progressive country.
#TolakRUUTNI #ReformasiTidakBolehMati #MiliterKembaliKeBarak #IndonesiaGelap #KawalSampaiTuntas
