MAGIC AND IT'S BEINGS

12 1 6
                                    

We know that magic is all around us but how did we truly know if it's true or how do we know or how its effects on living beings or non-living beings. Well even if the researchers previously found that it's been all around us. We don't have the capacity to prove its theory until many years after an invention. The invention is a machine that has the capacity to read the quantity of Magicules in its environment. This machine is called "Culeres", thanks to it allowing for an experiment to be realized. They needed two environments: the first is poor on Magicules while the second environment is rich on Magicules.

Experiment N°1 :

Animalia :

The first experiment is on animals. They got four animals, they have the same size, weight, age and species. Two of them are female and the other two is male. One of each sex of the animal were put at the two different environments. "The female that is in the poor environment was" called TFA1[1]. TFA2[2], "the female animal test subject in a rich environment". TMA1[3], "the male animal test subject in a poor environment". TMA2[4], "the male animal test subject in a rich environment".

After two years of experimenting the results were not as expected. They made a hypothesis that it's not the environment, but the beings are the main cause for emitting magic.

Hypothesis :

The TFA2 and the TMA2 showed that they started to emit magic meanwhile the TFA1 and the TMA1. They changed and haven't shown any improvements.

They started to do more experiments on different beings.

Experiment N°2 :

They did it on plants, non-living and even humans. They later did the plants and non-living beings.

Plantae :

The plants they experimented on 4 plants, 2 of each the same sex, the rest is the same age, species, and species. TFP1[5], "the female plant test subject in a poor environment". TFP2[6], "the female plant test subject in a rich environment". TMP1[7], "the male plant test subject in a poor environment". TMP2[8], "the male plant test subject in a rich environment".

Hypothesis :

The results were the same as the animal. The TMP2 and TFP2 started to emit magic, meanwhile the TMP1 and TFP1 didn't show signs of emitting magic. The TMP2 and TFP2 started to emit magic, meanwhile the TMP1 and TFP1 didn't show signs of emitting magic.

Non-Living Beings :

While the non-living, they took a rock. For the rock they did 4 rocks. The first two are normal rocks that we can find anywhere, while the other two are gems. The normal rock has the same weight, size and same type. The other two are minerals that have the same weight, size and the same type.

Rocks :

The TN1[9], "the normal rock test subject in a poor environment". TN2[10], "the normal rock test subject in a rich environment".

Hypothesis :

After two years the results were not what they expected, they thought that it would emit magic like the plants and animals but even in two years, TN2 emit very little magic meanwhile the TN1 like the other plants and animals, didn't emit any magic.

Minerals :

The TG1[11], "the mineral test subject in a poor environment". TG2[12], "the mineral test subject in a rich environment".

Hypothesis :

After two years the results were not what they expected, they thought that it would emit magic like the plants and animals but even in two years TG2 emit very little magic meanwhile TG1, like the other plants and animals, didn't emit any magic.

Magia CasterWhere stories live. Discover now