mildly controversial?

99 15 5
                                    

ive never understand the pressing issue of "girls supporting girls" and the whole inherent sense of "sisterhood" that people think is apparently universal among all women

like? ive never related to that. ive never looked at another girl and felt some kind of comradory just bc we both have tits

some of these particularly wacky feminists are trying to imply females are these loving pure goddesses that all unite in some sisterhood. and....that's not true in the least bit

no offense to anyone in particular but girls can be, like, really, really mean. awfully catty at the mildest. some of the worst drama ive seen has been solely confined to female-dominated groups and spaces.

men typically show anger...differently. ive seen dudes brawl in the hallway and then be bffs five seconds later. its less passive aggressive.

(obvs not the norm. i know some super catty guys too)

but like? yeah i typically like to avoid entirely female spaces. its not to my liking

but man, the whole logic behind the sisterhood thing is weird. im really not the "girl power" type of person and im not really that emotionally invested in my gender, so it just doesnt click for me. its just kinda creepy that people are insistent on me supporting someone just bc of their gender

obviously im gonna love everyone bc y'know, christianity, but turning this into a weird "girls vs boys" thing is totally counterproductive and useless

especially in fiction. its not bad for girls to have conflict or fight. its not antifeminist or bad.

just...don't treat females like sinless goddesses, that's creepy and diminutive to an entire group of strong, diverse people. we're not a "sisterhood" or a singularity.

back and fancier than everWhere stories live. Discover now