Third person's POV
Can people be evil by nature?
People are thinking beings, some are considered good and some are considered bad. At the beginning of life we are all considered equal, and it is a fact that a young child cannot be evil by nature. Genes do not contribute to the evil nature of humans either. Of course they are partly important for character, but this does not change the fact about nature. Therefore, the environment in which they are raised remains.
People believe that there are no 'bad' humans by nature. Everyone believes that, and yet people expose their fangs when it seems they may gain. People rationalize their behavior as soon as they are 'infected' with evil. To preserve their own twisted integrity, the world becomes twisted, unfair and false. Someone you considered "cool" until yesterday, today "stuck up"; someone you respected as "intelligent and knowledgeable" is now insulted as someone who "looks down on bad students" and "energetic vigor" becomes "annoying and too carried away".
And this is the main reason why Ayanokouji Kiyotaka wants to have peace and freedom in life. Lack of interaction with unnecessary problems and an unfair world. But nothing is for free and he must use everything he has to achieve this end.
Are there no people who are naturally evil?
The answer is "yes", however a person can be contaminated by bad conduct. The environment, people and the world itself make a person become that bad, by a light impulse.
There is still another issue. A "lie" is considered bad, whether we say it to protect or hurt someone.
All people are born liars and are mostly used to lying. If there is a person who has never lied. Then their existence would be a lie in itself. There are kind of nice lies, but they are still lies.
This means that we have two ideologies that contradict each other. On the one hand, people are liars from birth, and a lie is considered a bad thing, be it religious or social. Lying is considered a bad act. On the other hand, we have an idea that people cannot be evil by nature and it is the environment that shapes them.
Both these ideologies are considered to be correct by some people. However, they cannot be combined, so one of them must be false? Or both are false? Maybe someone will know the answer to this question. It doesn't make sense to come up with a theory on the subject alone, because even if this theory is very possible, it doesn't mean that it is true. Until we experience change, these reflections will remain the same.
________________________________________________________________________________
In the office behind the desk we see a white rat/mouse with a scar on its right eye and wearing its director's suit. He was holding his head after his lost chess game with a white-haired student again. He was broken down, felt frustration and irritation again.
After all, he is considered to be one of the smartest people in this school, his intellect was supposed to surpass most people, and yet he lost the chess game to a 15-year-old boy. As a result, he had to give the boy information about some villains and their quirks, which he was interested in.
He was a little suspicious of the boy's intentions, because why would anyone be so interested in the gifts of others. Of course, he may have just wanted to be ready for any eventuality in the fight against the villains, but he knew the boy for more than a few months and had never seen him interested in anything.
YOU ARE READING
Awakening of Ayanokouji - [COTE X BNHA]
FanfictionAyanokouji Kiyotaka, the perfect human, finds himself in the world of MHA/BNHA. How will he return and what awaits him there? Read to find out. COTE X BNHA crossover. I don't own Classroom of the Elite and Boku No Hero Academia. This is my fanfictio...