@callmenaanbread also, the movies for divergent and hunger games did not do the books justice. (i'm about to rant cause it rly annoyed me).
in divergent, the books showed so much of tris and four's romance more, whereas the movie missed so many key points of their relationship and their attaction ending up just being based upon their attraction to each other and the limited things they knew abt each other. for instance, in the scene of four's fear landscape, the book showed it in a way that tris was htere to help him through it. the movie however, made it seem like they were only in there, to train tris, and it wasn't romantic at all. i would have loved to see more of their romance .
as for hunger games, it was better, they didn't rly miss out key parts, but they changed peeta's personality a lot. in the movie's he was pretty timid and quiet, not rly expressing his feelings for katniss that much when he was off the screen away from the cameras. in the books, he is flirty and funny and i definetely think they should have included his personality from the books cause josh hutcherson definetely could have portrayed a flirty personality whilst still keeping the character relatable and funny.
also agggtm is a great book series (altho i have to admit, when i read the last book in the series at aged 10, i was pretty scared with all the mention of stalker's). in the series, it was pretty accurate apart from the fact that the dog WASN'T EVEN A GOLDEN RETRIEVER (altho it was still a cute dog). and ravi and pippa's relationship felt pretty rushed at the end, and they didn't rly have a proper ending). also, ravi looked so different (more attractive) in my head, so imma imagine him like that.
anywho, that's my rant; u don't have to read it all. but the movies did not do the books justice!!!!!