THE GLASS SLIPPER AWARDS || 2023

BEST DESCRIPTION RESULTS 🍷

𝙹𝚄𝙳𝙶𝙴:  Asmeon

𝙷𝚒 𝙴𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢𝚘𝚗𝚎, 𝚆𝚎𝚕𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙶𝚕𝚊𝚜𝚜 𝚜𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚙𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚜𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 (𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒 𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚢)!

𝙸'𝚖 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚐𝚎 𝙰𝚜𝚖𝚎𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚋𝚎𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝙸 𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚜, 𝙸 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚕𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚞𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚖𝚢 𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖.

𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚎𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚝𝚠𝚘 𝚘𝚏 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚑 3 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚑 𝚞𝚙 𝚝𝚘 4 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜.

𝙰𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚘 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚝, 𝙸 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚢 𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚔𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚝𝚘 '0' 𝚘𝚛 '1' 𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐. 𝚂𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚏 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚛 0.75 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚊 0 𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚊 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎, 𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚗'𝚝 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚝𝚘𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚜𝚑𝚕𝚢 :)!

🅣︎🅗︎🅔︎ 🅒︎🅐︎🅣︎🅔︎🅖︎🅞︎🅡︎🅘︎🅔︎🅢︎:

1. Well Written (3 points)
* Spelling (1) - Only focused on the spelling itself, not any grammar oddities.
* Grammar (1) - This category included odd sentence structures or strange choice of words
* Style (1) - An extra point for any who did something interesting with their description

2. Fit for Purpose (3 points)
* Informing (1) - Did the description give enough information to the reader/ intrigue the reader?
* Length (1) - Every word should count in the description, and shorter tends to be better. Points will be lost if the information is given superfluous
* Readability (1) - Could I understand the description completely?

3. To Continue or Not to Continue? (4 points)
* 0 points - the description did not invite me to keep on reading or even deterred me from reading on.
* 1 point - there is something there but not enough to convince me of trying to read on
* 2 points - I would probably give it a chapter but would not continue much further unless the story drags me in.
* 3 points - I would read it and give it a couple of chapters to drag me in when I have some time.
* 4 points - The description has intrigued me. I will start reading immediately and stick for a couple of chapters to give the story a chance.

And with that here are the scores:

🅢︎🅒︎🅞︎🅡︎🅔︎🅢︎

 

Not arranged according to positions

1. TheWordArtistBooks - 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝙴𝚈𝙴𝚂 𝙾𝙵 𝙿𝙾𝚆𝙴𝚁

Spelling (1/1) - Grammar (1/1) - Style (0/1) - Informing (1/1) - Length (0/1) - Readability (1/1) - Continue (4/4)
Overall the story sounds promising, the plot is conveyed well but maybe a bit too well as the blurb could be cut down a fair bit. No points given for style, as it was a pretty classical description, but full points for attracting my interest. Well done^^
(8/10)