The longer one deals with the criticism of the Cominform, the deeper one goes into detail, the clearer and more distinct our line of demarcation must be, especially after the historical experience of the betrayal of the modern revisionists and the social-fascist developments within the world communist movement.
We reject the criticism of the neo-revisionists that the Comintern (SH) takes a Trotskyist line vis-à-vis the Cominform. The reverse is true: Neo-revisionists are at best defenders of the anti-revisionism of the Cominform in words, but in deeds they continue the treachery of the modern revisionists under the guise of Marxism-Leninism.
It was the Trotskyists who collaborated with the Titoists in the Spanish Civil War, in the Yugoslav partisan struggle under the guidance of British intelligence, in the struggle against the Soviet Union and against the world socialist camp - and today in the struggle against the construction of a Stalinist-Hoxhaist world camp.
The Trotskyists praise Tito's "anti-Stalinism" and at the same time criticise Tito's nationalism. Above all, the Trotskyists criticise Tito for not having made an open break with Stalinism earlier, thus not overcoming the "Stalinist remnants". But in essence, Titoists and Trotskyists remain united in the struggle against Stalinism-Hoxhaism to this day. Just as Tito was then a splitter of the world socialist camp, the Trotskyists continue to be splitters of the world communist movement.
Titoism and Trotskyism are closely related branches of the imperialist ideology to split and decompose the proletarian ideology in order to adapt to the ideology of the bourgeoisie.
We Stalinists-Hoxhaists lead the struggle against both Trotskyism and Titoism on the ground of Stalinism-Hoxhaism. When the neo-revisionists call us "Trotskyists", they do so in the service of counterrevolution, they make themselves accomplices of world imperialism, they are enemies of world socialist revolution, world socialism and world communism.
With the liquidation of the Cominform, the world socialist camp was liquidated and with it the whole world communist movement. But through the operation of the dialectical principle of negation of negation, the Marxist-Leninist World Movement with the Party of Labour of Albania at its head developed in the struggle against the betrayal of the modern revisionists against the Cominform and the world socialist camp. And from the neo-revisionist betrayal of the Marxist-Leninist World Movement led by the Party of Labour of comrade Enver Hoxha, the Stalinist-Hoxhaist World Movement led by the Comintern (SH) developed.
Who were the enemies of the Cominform ?
The enemies of the Cominform were enemies of the international Stalin front.
They were enemies of the international doctrine of world proletarian organisation.
They were enemies of the international doctrine of world proletarian ideology.
They were enemies of the international doctrine of the world communist movement.
Without Stalinism, there would have been no Cominform.
And without Cominform there would be no leadership of the world socialist camp, which would perish without leadership.
This interrelation corresponds to the dialectical unity of ideology, organisation and movement.
Without the development of proletarian ideology there is no development of proletarian world organisation.
And without proletarian world organisation there is no development of the communist world movement.
1. Stalinism-Hoxhaism illuminates the road to world socialist revolution.
2. the Comintern (SH) shows the way to the Stalinist-Hoxhaist world movement to mobilise the masses to lead them to the world socialist revolution.
YOU ARE READING
ON THE COMINFORM
Historical Fiction70th anniversary of the Cominform-Bureau founded on 23rd of September 1947 published on occasion of the 109th birthday of comrade Enver Hoxha written by Wolfgang Eggers, 16th of October, 2017
