Judaism rocks !!

Why universal judaism and not christianity

Why universal Judaism and not Christianity
By rabino boricua virtual
The noble Christian tradition says that opposite to our sense of what we harvest we recollect when it's to the justification of the soul that no one who can follow all the laws of the Torah and according to Christianity that perfection is only reach it trough Jesus (peace and blessing are upon him). In other words when someone believes in the sacrifice of Jesus (pbuh) the justice of his perfect life that (they said) lived the Nazarene your whole sin is taking away, luckily now God sees you as a morally perfect person. To justify this belief, they quote a passage from the law where it says that Abraham was justified by his faith, it is justified that they use this verse ? What's the problem with the Christian theology? The problem is that, it may sound like a seductive and attractive idea, when we analyse it closely, it's found as a easy way of witchery (it's like saying that using these and those words or believing in this or other spell, we can get what we want to) these theology is false and abominable, because it cancels the revelation that God gave to Israel, when he commanded this: Be careful not to forget Jehovah your God by failing to keep his commandments, his judicial decisions, and his statutes that I am commanding you today. "If you should ever forget Jehovah your God and you walk after other gods and serve them and bow down to them, I do bear witness against you today that you will surely perish. Like the nations that Jehovah is destroying before you, that is how you will perish, because you would not listen to the voice of Jehovah your God. Deuteronomy 8:11, 19 and 20, even more ! The Christian theology doesn't only violate the the teachings of God to the Israelites, it violates the gospel teaching of Jesus to his disciples that no one can be perfect not even good, and Jesus himself say that he wasn't good: Jesus said to him: "Why do you call me good? Nobody is good except one, God. Luke 18:19, in fact, like Christianity teaches Jesus (pbuh) was the only man who was able to obey perfectly the law, we can say that Jesus was the best man alive !!, but this is just a wishful thinking, because Jesus himself say the opposite: Truly I say to you, among those born of women, there has not been raised up anyone greater than John the Baptist, so the gospel is saying that not only was Jesus disqualified of being perfect and even more John the Baptist was greater !. Can we prove these things, those the gospels shown a moral imperfection, absolutely; the Christians writings teach that God didn't make an exception with people: where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, foreigner, Scythʹi·an, slave, or freeman; but Christ is all things and in all. Colossians 3:11. But the gospel quotes Jesus (peace and blessing be upon him) did an exception in persons: In reply Jesus said: "All ten were cleansed, were they not? Where, then, are the other nine? 18 Did no one else turn back to give glory to God except this man of another nation? Luke 17:17-18 or like In mark 7:27 But he said to her: "First let the children be satisfied, for it is not right to take the bread of the children and throw it to the little dogs, another example is when Paul broke the law calling the high priest whitewashed wall: 3 Then Paul said to him: "God is going to strike you, you whitewashed wall. Do you sit to judge me according to the Law and at the same time violate the Law by commanding me to be struck?" 4 Those standing by said: "Are you insulting the high priest of God?" 5 And Paul said: "Brothers, I did not know he was high priest. For it is written, 'You must not speak injuriously of a ruler of your people.'" Acts 23:3-5, in that last verse Paul is admitting he violate the law: 28 "You must not curse God nor curse a chieftain among your people. Exodus 22:28 orders not to curse a leader of Israel similar to what Jesus did in Matthew 23:27: "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because you resemble whitewashed graves, which outwardly indeed appear beautiful but inside are full of dead men's bones and of every sort of uncleanness. The truth is those who hear and walk with Jesus (peace be upon him) was a powerful prophet (an anointed man by the creator to guide the people of God to the repentance) like the Nazarene himself says when he's quoted saying: But now you are seeking to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. John 8:40, the disciples of the galilee gave themselves testimony saying: He asked them: "What things?" They said to him: "The things concerning Jesus the Naz·a·reneʹ, who proved to be a prophet powerful in deed and word before God and all the people Luke 24:19, the fact that Jesus (peace be upon him) wasn't the "perfect man" that Christianity claims is supported by this passage where Paul speaks to a church in Corinth saying: For some from the house of Chloʹe have informed me regarding you, my brothers, that there are dissensions among you. 12 What I mean is this, that each one of you says: "I belong to Paul," "But I to A·polʹlos," "But I to Ceʹphas," "But I to Christ.", notice how amazing this passage that throws to the dust the sayings of the deity and perfect moral of the Nazarene (peace and blessing be upon him) this first disciples that knew perfectly the reality about the Christian movement were divided in four groups and each group followed who they think was a best Christian ones followed Paul others Apollo other Peter and the last ones Jesus, note how un logical that passage sounds, if Jesus was perfectly moral (not like Paul, Apollo or Peter) how it's possible that some believers wouldn't follow the perfect example of the Nazarene, how the would not follow the son of God and follow mans who were limited, let's have present that Jesus didn't write an inspired book like Paul or Peter he didn't give any instructions of how his followers should live, in that aspect, by the way look the superiority of the revelation of God to Moses unlike the gospels the law gave the precise form in which every Israelite should live their faith in the God of Israel. Now let's talk about the justification by faith that they said the life of the Nazarene (peace be upon him) provide according to christian theology the value of this argument rest on the saying that Jesus keep the law perfectly and that perfection passes to the believer in him.but, as we shown earlier the Nazarene didn't fulfilled the law perfectly, by the way, maybe that same incapacity of fulfilling the law perfectly what the law commands, what motivate the galilee to participate in the baptism of john; a baptism of repentance. If Jesus did keep the law perfectly then why he needed to baptise the scripture says: John the Baptizer was in the wilderness, preaching baptism in symbol of repentance for forgiveness of sins. (Actually if someone was qualified of being a sacrifice was John the Baptist) wasn't the law of Moses a way of introducing people to repentance so they can escape from Gehinnom (hell) ? ¿Was there necessity of a man (like Jesus) died and resurrected from the death so that man can be forgiven? What answer that they say was justified by faith alone (Abraham) ? It's funny but the Jesus himself give us the answer: for I have five brothers, in order that he may give them a thorough witness so that they will not also come into this place of torment.' But Abraham said, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.' Then he said, 'No, indeed, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.' But he said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.'" It's saying that Abraham states that someone raise up from the dead (like Christianity affirms it happened with Jesus) this is not really necessary, because men has all they need In Moses and the prophets all you need to repentance (and don't end like the rich man) in few words, there's not such a thing as a vicar sacrifice, when a perfect man sacrifices his soul literally, to save the humanity from the sins. That perfect man (sinless) doesn't exist, and will never exist, because it's written: 20 For there is no righteous man on earth who always does good and never sins. Ecclesiastes 7:20. In fact, the danger with the idea of the vicar sacrifice, is that it could have brought Israelites and pagans practice the old sacrificing system of children. Is that, if the death of an innocent person can make the forgiveness of sins, then a father would have seen tempted he would search a way of forgiveness, offering one of his little children (that can be for example his firstborn) and maybe that's the reason why the prophet Micah say this theology was wrong when he say: 6 With what will I come before Jehovah? With what will I bow before God on high? Will I come before him with whole burnt offerings, With year-old calves? 7 Will Jehovah be pleased with thousands of rams, With tens of thousands of torrents of oil? Will I give my firstborn son for my revolt, The fruit of my body for my sin? 8 He has told you, O man, what is good. And what is Jehovah requiring of you? Only to exercise justice, to cherish loyalty, And to walk in modesty with your God! 9 The voice of Jehovah calls out to the city; Micah 6:6-8. The creator (blessed be his name) gives testimony of the mercy the man has for his neighbour, when thought the prophet Hosea told: 6 For in loyal love I delight, not in sacrifice, And in the knowledge of God, rather than in whole burnt offerings. Hosea 6:6 and what's the knowledge of God? It is to make justice and mercy like it's written: 15 Will you continue reigning because you outdo others in your use of cedar? Your father also ate and drank, But he upheld justice and righteousness, And it went well with him. 16 He defended the legal claim of the afflicted one and the poor one, So that it went well. 'Is that not what it means to know me?' declares Jehovah. Jeremiah 22:15-16. On the other side, the Christian theology use the text of genesis 15:6 to proof the salvation by faith and not by works, but if we will use the same argument to the revelation gives to Moses (400 years later), we have to conclude that the "salvation by faith" (without need of works) was leaved by God to change to "salvation through works" (the obedience of the law) the Torah says: But just then, there came one of the Israelites bringing near to his brothers a Midʹi·an·ite woman before the eyes of Moses and of all the assembly of the Israelites, while they were weeping at the entrance of the tent of meeting. 7 When Phinʹe·has the son of El·e·aʹzar the son of Aaron the priest saw it, he immediately rose up from the midst of the assembly and took a spear in his hand. 8 Then he went after the man of Israel into the tent and pierced both of them through, the man of Israel and the woman through her genital parts. At that the scourge on the Israelites was halted. Numbers 25:6-8 the last passage says that phinehas take the idea of following what's on the law of Moses: Now regarding a man who commits adultery with another man's wife: The one who commits adultery with the wife of his fellow man should be put to death without fail, the adulterer and the adulteress Leviticus 20:10, in that passage is shown that God is mad at the Israelites because of their sin, how would Israel be justified ?, having faith in some messiah that would redeem them, or getting back to God through obedience in his law, phinehas choose the right path for divine justification, obeying the law, did God punish him for that ?, let's see: 20 They exchanged my glory For the representation of a grass-eating bull. 21 They forgot God their Savior, Who did great things in Egypt, 22 Wonderful works in the land of Ham, Awe-inspiring deeds at the Red Sea. 23 He was about to order their annihilation, But Moses his chosen one interceded with him To avert his destructive anger. 24 Then they despised the desirable land; They had no faith in his promise. 25 They kept grumbling in their tents; They did not listen to the voice of Jehovah. 26 So he raised his hand in an oath concerning them That he would make them fall in the wilderness; 27 He would make their descendants fall among the nations, And he would scatter them throughout the lands. 28 Then they joined in worship of Baʹal of Peʹor, And they ate sacrifices offered to the dead. 29 They provoked Him by their actions, And a scourge broke out among them. 30 But when Phinʹe·has stood up and intervened, The scourge was halted. 31 And it was counted to him as righteousness. These verse affirms that God was glad that phinehas did what the law commanded was justified (just as happened with Abraham), it's like this, "if believe" justified Abraham, now believe was replace for work (according to the law). Not just that, the justification gave to Abraham (that didn't say it was going to be permanent), the justification of phinehas is immutable, it's like this whoever keeps the law shall be justified forever and ever, is forever and ever, maybe this is why is the reason the justification of Abraham wasn't included in the covenant, because Moses said that would be replaced for the justification of following the the laws of God, and besides Abraham didn't know about the 613 laws of the divine law and therefore couldn't be justified by obedience to the law he didn't know, he could just be justified by his faith in promise of God to his seed; that God would would take him out of captivity with strong arm and extended to be his God and king( making them following his laws) but once they receive the law there wasn't any justification to disobey the orders of the Lord. It is like this, if Abraham would have lived long enough to be there when Moses received the commandments, he wouldn't use the promise of justification by faith as an excuse for not to keep the law, but would have encouraged everyone to follow it, the curious thing here is that Jesus as a master of universal Judaism confirm all of these, in Luke 16:29, that's why it doesn't surprise any Jew (who has study the law) reading the words that quote the Galilee saying that no one can be great (at God's eyes) unless they keep the law of Moses, read Matthew 5:19 and Matthew 19:17 all this is what a good master (or "rabbi") that preaches universal Judaism ( the ethics of the law of Moses), it's interesting to notice that there's similarities in the case of phineas and John the Baptist. It is like this while Moses (peace be upon him) quiet the sin of Israel in front of God, phineas shows an unquestionable fidelity to the law (something that Moses later on has to exalt), while Jesus quiets before the sin of Herod, John decides to show his unquestionable loyalty to the law ( his fidelity was so big that he even give up his for it !!) that's why Jesus have to recognise that there was no better man than John the Baptist (this obviously includes Jesus), in summary the modern Christian theology is totally wrong and doesn't even go with the teaching of the master of Galilee, who really believes in Jesus should start practicing universal Judaism that Jesus himself practiced, renouncing to the false doctrine of salvation by faith (without following the law) and quit the idea of Jesus being God too, and that he was the perfect man who paid for our sins, because if a persons does bad no faith in the Nazarene would stop him doing evil things, like the Galilee(peace be upon him) himself taught read Matthew 6:15. It's like this if you don't any good to your neighbour he cannot expect God's forgiveness even if you have faith in Jesus. Jesus came to exhort us the true spirit of the law not "to break the yoke of the law". In fact Jesus himself exhorted his disciples to imitate him and take that yoke too (because remember Jesus followed the law too !!) read Matthew 11:29 what kind of yoke is the Nazarene talking about ?, Jesus is talking about Jeremiah 2:19-20, in other words, the yoke that Jesus is talking is about the obedience to God and his law so no one can fear a human authority If his not going to be under his law, so no one can fear God (his divine authority) if he doesn't want to keep his laws. So believing in Jesus is believing in the good news that the creator (blessed be his name) justifies whoever repents and follows his holy laws, living the ethic and moral life that not just the Nazarene lived but Abraham, Moses and all the prophets (the peace of the creator is with all of them) like it's written read Isaiah 1:16-18. Someone can argument, that what's show in here in here, it's not correct; because without believing in any of these things, in a moment he has already felt the miraculous intervention of God in his life this is a big mistake ! The scripture shows that miracles and the divine interventions that we experiment is a sign of God's mercy and not to prove the veracity of our theology. Read judges 11. The reality is that a master universal Judaism, knows that miracles ARE NOT confirmation of the divine approve (nor the theology) of who receives the miracle or does it (the magicians of the pharaoh did miracles, but God exterminate them in the Red Sea) because of that its no surprise that Jesus himself that that someone can receive or do miracles ( like wizards, astrologers and fortune tellers) and not even know God read Matthew 7:22-23. Want to obtain the rest and the joy in the heart that the Galilee was talking about? Well start living the commandments; quit to that lie that the law is death and cursing; because the truth is that the creator promised give happiness to those who follow his commandments like it's written, read psalm 19:8.