Yeah, so if you're reading this, it means either you think my thoughts are interesting, either you ignored what I wrote lately.
However, here I am with another chapter, and wishing to do my best. Hope you will enjoy!
Well, we all know, despite medical speaking, the heart guides the love. And may be that's why the most people blindly chose to be controlled by heart, and not by brain. What I know for sure is that is the reason why I did not choose it. Why? Because love leads to unconscious doings, so it leads to unavoidable failure. Of course that in our life we must get love, and give love. It is a positive feeling, "make love, not war".
But here comes the problem: when we give love, we are actually more day-dreamers, more optimist, more idealists. We forget to reflect on our achievements, we forget to bring new ideas, we forget about our life goals and about the possibility of mistakes. We just contemplate, surprised about how astonishing love can be. Those people whose lives are guided by heart, they will do nothing but these.
I may be wrong. Very wrong. But I write this for people whose lives are guided by brain. So I can improve their motivation to not change their 'road'. I also can't be certain about many things, because I know nothing about what heart offers to a man's life. Those up there were my thoughts, and until a scientific statement dethrone my opinion, I won't change them.
That goes without saying that heart-choosing has its benefits. Those kind of people may be more likely to be popular in some social groups, or be preferred by the others just because of the fact that they have the same 'road' (you know, if you choose heart, you're more likely to be attracted -in any way- by some whose way of life is guided by heart, also) or because they are more sincere and more open to friendship, then the brain-choosers.
As a brain-chooser, I can claim that I'm not that open to the others, and that is not because I'm not friendly, but because it's not my asset... and my priority is now, and will for ever be carrier. I am also inclined to math, physics or psychology skills. And I lack the social ones. These can, likewise, determinate which way to choose; I mean, if you go for brain, then you probably must be either a sociopath, either a decided man, with a lots of ideas and an accurate life purpose, and more likely very very weird. At least this is the way I am...
I think the heart-choosers are more inclined to poetry, painting, traveling, teaching etc. Or else I could not explain why I choose to write Non-Fiction, because I have nothing to do with poetry or this sort of things.
I can not imagine my life guided by heart, and if I would ever could, I would be more likely hypocrite, so I try not to do it.
Nowadays, people are more open to love, which is an abstract and pretty unknown feeling for people. I take it society isn't ready to give "love" a definition yet. So, as my day-by-day decisions are based on certain statements, I didn't choose love, heart implicit.
Oh well, I have got a new problem, anyway: I didn't' discover what 'brain' stands for. May be for intelligence, or thinking. But what I certainly know is the fact that the brain-choosers will never be preferred by society. Why? Because they have a different mentality. And they are just a few, so power-less. And if you are different, then either you are a danger for society, or you are in danger. Of course, that depends on no one but yourself.
YOU ARE READING
Thinking big
Non-FictionIt's about things you may already know, but from another point of view, with another way of speaking. Aaagsdfghjkl I think too much and so, I started to feel afraid of losing my thoughts and ideas, so I wrote them down. "Whenever you find yo...
