sntdivi
Not all historical fiction set in the colonial period automatically serves as propaganda for colonial power.
Let’s not flatten the analysis.
The act of portraying beauty within violence is not romanticization, but a way of exposing the contradictions within an oppressive system.
Under colonial rule, life did not simply stop. People continued to love, to resist, to search for meaning. And that is precisely the point, that no matter how brutal the oppression, it could never fully extinguish the humanity of the people.
This does not to beautify the system; it reveals just how deeply rotten it is.
What’s more dangerous is the insistence on seeing history in a single dimension, either pure darkness or pure light. That kind of thinking is not critical, but a dogmatic.
History is a site of struggle, between power and resistance, suppression and survival.
So instead of policing writers, we should be pushing for more critical, nuanced narratives.... ones that refuse to hide the violence of colonialism, but also refuse to erase the agency of those who lived and fought within it.
This is not a simple matter of “romanticizing” or “condemning”. It is about presenting truth in its full, complex, and uncompromising form.
sntdivi
@sntdivi Hi po, I'm not pertaining to anyone po hehehe. I'm just expressing some thoughts and other individuals are not involved
•
Reply