Omnibyte Simulation-multiverse Deal

0001 : (SKIP TO CHAPTER 0005 INSTEAD) - Author's Notes - Part 1

0001 : (SKIP TO CHAPTER 0005 INSTEAD) - Author's Notes - Part 1

If a person got hit on the arm, it is said that the person got hit, despite that only a part of the person got hit. "If a guy is attracted to only the "visible physical non-behavioral appearance" of a particular woman, despite that only a part of her is her "visible physical non-behavioral appearance"", does he find her attractive?

Does "truth" exist only in the form of "information", or are "living individuals" forms of "truth" too? Just to get a clearer perspective, if the word "truth" can be used as a word for "living individuals" as well as information", then the sentence "she 'gave birth at the hospital' to a truth named Joe, her son" is a proper normal sentence, correct?

Material existences are physical entities. Are there any examples of confirmed actually existing non-physical entities? Is magnetism/gravity an example of a non-physical entity? Is AI "a physical entity or a non-physical entity"?

The "when/where humans move their own arms/etc" are "not via "code/programming from their own DNA/genes/instincts". Self-agency enables actual intelligence. Are all of "what humans have currently given the label "AI"" actually "mock intelligence"?

Is "solely one's thinking/mental" capable of "eyeball-observeably physically affecting" an other "via "solely thought/mental activity""? (Audio is sound, audio/sound is a part of Physics, so audio/sound is physical in that sense)

Is a "simulation via solely biological means" possible? A "Blue Gene supercomputer's NEURON software" involves a partially biologically realistic model of neurons. Is "biological cloning" the "biological equivalent" to computers' ""Copy" then "Paste""?

Other than the word "simulation" also means "the action of pretending; deception": A "simulation" is a mock-version of (a) "thing(s) (e.g. "non-imaginary things"/"things of fantasy")". Is "simulation" ever able to not be a mock-version of something?

Since the word "simulation" also means "imitation of a situation or process", that depends on if people are able to imitate a situation or process. Can people imitate a situation or process?

Excluding all Hindu-related definition meanings, does the word "avatar" have multiple meanings?

Was Tamagotchi the first "for-kids simulation" that was "a computer-tech device that ""displayed the simulation" via that device's screen"" & was available-for-purchase at many various stores?

Regarding causality, if a set of dominoes all fall due to a domino being tipped over which that causes a chain-reaction tipping over each domino, the dominoes all fell due to that first tipped-over domino that which caused a chain-reaction of causes?

"Does one use one's own will to initiate "some or each" new thought that one has" or "are ""some or each" new thought that one has" initiated "as an inevitable result ""of and/or "due to"" causality"""?

According to Science, other than conjoined twins, has a human body ever been the container/vessel of more than one verbally communicative individual? I doubt that such is naturally possible.

Aside from implants being able to be the reason/cause as to one thinking up concepts (such as implant design), implants were never non-physical, implants still aren't non-physical, implants were never able to do something non-physical, and implants still aren't able to do something non-physical.

Regarding the multiverse concept whereby "new/different timelines ""branch off of an original timeline" whenever, per "choice oneself encountered", oneself chooses something"", per "alternate version of oneself", "oneself shares the same past as the "alternate version of oneself" only up to whenever the "timeline that the "alternate version of oneself" belongs to" branched off of the "timeline that oneself belongs to"". Correct?