Omnibyte Simulation-multiverse Deal

0004 : (SKIP TO CHAPTER 0005 INSTEAD) - Author's Notes - Part 4

0004 : (SKIP TO CHAPTER 0005 INSTEAD) - Author's Notes - Part 4

Regarding human neuronal network connections, since each imagining ever imagined is comprised of only memories due to "what one was ever exposed to" (physics/colors/sounds/words/etc) being the basis of everything that one is capable of imagining, is it scientifically possible to "discover whether one had eaten oyster or "had imagined eating oyster even though one had never actually eaten oyster ever in one's life"" via the "information that can be obtained from a collection of screenshots that collectively only show, as if all of those screenshots had "captured what they captured" while all of time in this universe had been paused, all of one's entire neuronal network connections that one had during the time that the screenshots had "captured what they captured" which happens to be during while one was imagining eating oyster"?

Is it scientifically possible to "do any mapping of any neuronal network(s)" via solely based on "brain waves"?

Is/Will it (be) possible to "post a tweet on Twitter" via a BCI (Brain-computer Interface) that, regarding a biological brain, only utilizes that brain's "brain wave(s) data"? Does a physical BCI tech have to be "touching the brain" to pull that off?

Based on the research I've done on different kinds of BCI:

The data/information that can be obtained from soley brain waves is very limited and vague.

Even when it comes to being able to control a robotic limb by one using one's brain/mind, trying to use only brain waves and nothing more (no implants/etc) results in very poor ability to control/manipulate the robotic limb. "Implants and/or "the information that can be obtained "from other sources that are from one's brain" instead of "from brain waves""" are pretty much included in what is standard for the ability to be able to control a robotic limb by one using one's brain/mind.

Personally, I don't agree that thought police should ever exist, but out of curiosity, would you ever agree that thought police should exist? Do you believe that there should be one(s) being judge, jury, & "verdict giver" with authoritive final say?

"Thought police" would be police whose job would be policing people's thoughts. I will never agree that such should "exist and/or be implemented". I will never agree based on grounds that "such a system would ""breach people's privacy" to try to prevent crime(s)" based on potential instead of valid support".

Is ""the right to bodily security" or "the right to bodily integrity"" recognized/acknowledged by a country?

Regarding cyber, can "multiple AI interact with each other" via a particular "virtual environment" but also simultaneously not have the ability to be/achieve/have hive mind?

Of course. The "virtual environement" can be a program and ""each AI that interacts with other AI" via the "virtual environment program"" can be a program. Each AI program can "control an avatar that is part of the "virtual environment program"" via "Application Programming Interface". ("much like a human who controls an avatar in a video game" via a "physical video game joystick controller" being the interface). The "virtual environement" can be the program that each "avatar controlled by an AI program (each AI is programmed/coded to be limited to be able to control only one avatar)" gets implemented into by biological humans who do the programming/coding in "the non-cyber physical universe that biological humans currently breathe in". The "virtual environment program" can be either a regular non-AI program or an AI program that is limited in capability/ability due to its programming/code. All of said AI programs can be programmed/coded to be limited to not ever being able to breach any of each other's privacy of "thinking/thought(s), programming, and code". All of said programs can (via what is described by the aforementioned) interact with each other via "Application Programming Interface", however, each said program can be programmed/coded to be permanently non-stop no-pause "accessing its own avatar and being in control of said avatar", which means that each said program is permanently utilizing "Application Programming Interface". This results in AI not having/"being able to be/have" hive mind. This results in each AI having its own individual privacy that enables AI to "keep something/things secret in a way that other AI can't (easily) discover" should they choose to try to keep something/things secret.