⮑ i. typefaces v. fonts

79 3 0
                                    

since it's tuesday, here's the first background chapter! let's talk some typography

Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.

since it's tuesday, here's the first background chapter! let's talk some typography.

this is a common misconception, but it has a simple explanation!

fonts are the varying weights of a typeface. a typeface is a family of fonts.

for example (and you can see below), baskerville is a typeface, baskerville bold and etc. are fonts.

(my image)

Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.

(my image)

disclaimer: these are not all typefaces i would recommend, they are just decent examples. magis authentic (i spelled it wrong in the image lol) doesn't have fonts but i added it as a recc because i like it (to some extent), though. i absolutely adore types like gishella morely, but something like linux libertine is not exactly my forte.

— ♡ so, there's the super quick overview of typefaces v. fonts! 

i misuse the terms all the time, and although i don't personally believe which term you use matters all that much—i mean, like kel lauren said: "font or typeface, depends on how pretentious you are." lol. most people just say "font", but it's still important terminology to differentiate when needed! (and to use in proper situations. i only learned of it a week or so ago, so.. yeah. definitely good to know :)

xo, som <3

« typography » editing tips! ✧˚·Where stories live. Discover now