This could be for (maybe hypothetical) fiction projects. Maybe it could be for crossover fiction projects. Maybe it could be for projects involving characters of Nick shows as TLH and TCG, CN shows, Disney shows(like TGAMM, Kiff, a crossover between old and new that is actually my House of Mouse reboot concept), YouTube(or various other sites) videos with TTS characters(by Kenstertube(Tracle), nkrs200, SamJoe404, SuperSwirlyTitan198, etc.), and other characters of then and now interacting with live-action people akin to Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Cool World(though we don't talk about that), the SpongeBob film trilogy and some episodes, the two Space Jams, and Disney's Chip n Dale: Rescue Rangers. Maybe it could be for a hypothesis if it existed irl.
Perhaps it could take place in an AU without United States vs Paramount Pictures, Inc., with film studios not only operating streaming services, but also still owning movie theaters named after them, with places like the New York Paramount Theater tied to Paramount Plus, the Visalia Fox Theater being owned by Disney, and maybe renamed, with it being tied to Disney+ and Hulu, and some theaters sharing services. Would we see something like the Australians building Village Cinemas and, with help from Warner Bros., building Warner Village Cinemas in the U.S.? Would there be plain Warner Cinemas once again alongside WVC? Would brands like Mycal in Japan, Lusomundo in Portugal, and whatever Sogecable is these days in Spain, expand into the American continents? I don't want to go overboard, but there are too many details to think about. Though imagine the WC and WVC places being tied to Max(formerly HBO Max).
There could be news broadcasts like ABC News at the Disney-owned theaters, CBS News and CBS This Morning(and maybe CBS This Mountain?) at the Paramount theaters, CNN at Warner-owned places, etc. And theaters could share services like Netflix and Amazon Prime. And maybe there could be deals regarding joint ventures like co-distributed films and using each other's streaming services alongside their own, even to ease up on rivalries and competitions without violating national and international laws.
Okay, I'm getting sidetracked. But do you still get the idea? Anyway, moving on.
From my experience, Regal Cinemas, while still aligned with National CineMedia(NCM), would use a special cell phone policy. I wrote about it on other parts of the net like the AVID page for the trailer. The discussions page to be precise. My username on the site is LogoExpert. As for my description of the policy, I recall from memory from 2004-2006.
Now then, there would be this new type of policy trailer.
A few years later, an improved version.
Eventually, other companies would start using this trailer, but add their own twists to it.
There would be an evolution occurring.
There is a generic variant used by many NCM-aligned theaters.
They also use their own non-generic versions.
The questions for this section regarding the identity: What would the company be known as and why? What would be the varying brands if there are any formed and/or acquired and why? What acquired or original brands would be folded and why? What would the logo (for the main brand and the subbrands/divisions) even be like?
For context on branding, Regal Entertainment Group was originally established with acquisitions of Regal Cinemas, United Artists Theaters, and Edwards Theaters. Cinemark acquired Century Theaters, Tinseltown, and Rave Cinemas throughout its history. A number of brands have been folded by both companies in recent years.
The remaining questions: Would there be other locations to establish multiplexes of this company? Why or why not? What would be other locations to establish multiplexes owned by this company, if any, and why? How many buildings would be in each location? What would be the occupied space for each of them? How many screens would each location be built with? (There is variance, even among the Regal-owned theaters in Fresno.) Would it align with National CineMedia for Noovie preshows? Why or why not? Would it adopt the NCM cell phone policy trailer that was allegedly scored by Danny Elfman(with Steve Bartek assumed to be the likely arranger)? Why or why not? Would it have its own logo above the reminder texts, or would it be the "Enjoy the show!" variant? For what reason?
This could be useful. https://avid.miraheze.org/wiki/NCM_Cell_Phone_Policy_Trailers Look through the confirmed variants section of the second logo and it might help. And methinks that only one sponsor can be credited in regards to the thing. Also, other versions of the policy trailer are on YouTube, like one of Regal during 2017 with the brand names directly under it like the Cinemark one, and one with Amazon Prime being the sponsor of the Cinemark one.
What would the bottom text read? Would the text, "Your feature presentation will begin momentarily." be included? Who would be the sponsor(s) and why? Looking at the linked AVID page, what would the announcer be saying? Would there be a 3D version like Regal, Cinemark, AMC, and others did? Why or why not?
And that's pretty much it. The survey is linked in the profile page for this entry for you guys to fill out if you gain interest. I'm considering showcasing your answers in a way that a chapter is dedicated to a user.
