Gigged Up

Chapter 4 - Author's Notes (Part 3)

Chapter 4 – Author's Notes (Part 3)

If you have your neural network activity recorded from when you are a baby to age 25 & that data is used for an AI's artificial neural network activity to imitate your recorded neural network activity, will the AI experience your 25 years experience?

Is there an existing member of the United States who, while in the United States, is an exception regarding being required to be in accordance with the United States' law/legalities?

Existing members of the USA, while in the USA, are supposed to undergo USA's criminal justice system(s) when law enforcement catches said member breaking the Law. Is there an existing member of the USA who, while in the USA, is an exception?

Can/Will AI be able to change all of "the content/info/dates of any computer file (e.g. official legal records)" to be completely different than "what said file originated as having" & leave the computer "file type" unchanged? Is such AI legal?

If Person A has/had sex with Person B, can Person A be considered "one who loves/loved Person B" if Person A never has/had feelings for Person B (as in Person A never cares/cared about "Person B nor what happens/happened to Person B")?

If ever a "scattered but united 400,000 people" organize trying to smear choice people (for reasons unknown to you), "target you & quickly take up all residencies in your city" so that you think the world is against you, what would you do to conquer such a tribulation?

Should you judge your decisions on the scale of "good and bad" or "right and wrong"?

Good is most justified, honorable, admirable, and, if you believe in Karma, should result in good Karma, at some "afterwards point" during your existence. When it comes to bad and/or wrong, it depends on what is "acceptedly known by society" as bad, and it depends on what is "acceptedly known by society" as wrong. For example: the "no snitching rule" that isn't part of a country's official laws/rules, if you confirm that "the person who is your closest dearest relationship" murdered someone who has long been killing everyone's pets but you also know that you can expose that the "person who is your closest dearest relationship" commited the murder and doing so will not result in anybody treating you differenty than how they always treated you plus you won't face any consequences from "anyone including any law-related authorities", what should you base your decision on. Depending on what is "acceptedly known by society" as bad/wrong, such a murder might be considered bad/wrong, or might be considered good, or might be considered bad/wrong by an amount of people and simultaneously considered good by an amount of other people. Even abiding by the dictionary definition of good, good can be cold. When it comes to the word "right", it depends on which meaning people think all decisions should be made regarding the word "right". "Right" can mean being accurate, or "right" can mean being (morally) righteous. If all you care about is being accurate as much as you can, then whenever you hear inaccurate information and you are asked if the information is accurate, ""do you remain silent regarding the aforementioned example" and "is that considered good""?

In current USA, does ""neighbors spying and reporting on other neighbors" via the direction of law enforcement" ever happen(?) as part of community policing?

Is community policing ever only done by community members who aren't legal official credentials-having Law Enforcement members & can community policing ever not be info exchange between "fond-of-each-other "community member & Law Enforcement""?

Can the following be (considered) vigilantism?:

Due to "particular individuals'" particular things/acts, an organized/unified group of people "carry out judgement against those individuals but that organized/unified group of people knowingly don't/won't carry out judgement against their own members who are guilty of same aforementioned things/acts as the aforementioned "particular individuals"".