okey so i sorta got into an argument with someONE so here's what i'm saying.
yes. a lot of people still stan others that are problematic. in fact, basically everyone is problematic in some way.
bUT what i don't understand is why people still stan others thAT ARE CONFIRMED TO BE PROBLEMATIC AND HAVE DONE MAJORLY PROBLEMATIC THINGS. tAKE COLD SPROUTS, for example. hoW that actual fuck is he still stanned?????? and what he's done iSn'T EVEN A RUMOR.
it happened in REAL TIME that he used his fans as a social experiment, he's tweeted things that have receipts even though he's deleted them. so tell me, how the fuck do people still like him?
and then on the other hand, tom holland. so? some people said that what he said in china made him 'transphobic'. and the person i 'talked' to said that made him like cold sprouts. one, you can't confirm whether he did it directly or just worded his sentence wrong. cold sprouts has used mlk as reverse racism, wE HAVE RECEIPTS AND HE'S STATED HIS OPINION LOUD AND CLEAR FOR ALL TO HEAR.
chances are, everyone stans someone that's problematic, even in the smallest ways.
but i'm tired of people comparing mAJORLY problematic people, ( fake paul, cold sprouts, hollend rodent, bellow thorne, team ew ) to people that aren't even confirmed to be problematic.
this is technically still my opinion but hey, if you don't like my opinion why the hell are you reading a book where i specifically said it's about my opinion :)
