PSYCHOLOGY

Myth and psychology

One of the most celebrated writers about myth from a psychological standpoint was . In his Die Traumdeutung (1899; ) he posited a phenomenon called the , that is, the male child's repressed desire for his mother and a corresponding wish to supplant his father. (The equivalent for girls was the complex.) According to Freud, this phenomenon was detectable in dreams and myths, fairy tales, folktales—even jokes. Later, in Totem und Tabu (1913; ), Freud suggested that myth was the distorted wish-dreams of entire peoples. More than that, however, he saw the Oedipus complex as a memory of a real episode that had occurred in what he termed the "primal horde," when sons oppressed by their father had revolted, had driven out or killed him, and had taken his wives for themselves. That subsequent generations refrained from doing so was, Freud suggested, due to a collective . The relevance of Freud's investigations to the study of myth lies in his view that the formation of mythic concepts does not depend on cultural history. Instead, Freud's analysis of the posited an independent, trans-historical mechanism, based on a highly personal biologic of human beings. His anthropological theories have since been refuted (e.g., totemic [symbolic animal] sacrifice as the earliest ritual custom, which he related to the first parricide), but his analysis is still regarded with interest by some reputable social scientists. , however, has been leveled against the explanation of myths in terms of only one theme and in terms of the "repression" of conscious ideas.

Another theorist preoccupied with psychological aspects of myth was the Swiss psychoanalyst , who, like Freud, was stimulated by a theory that no longer has much support—i.e., the theory of , a French philosopher, associating myth with prelogical mentality. This, according to Lévy-Bruhl, was a type of thought that had been common to archaic human beings, that was still common to primitives, and in which people supposedly experienced some form of "mystical participation" with the objects of their thought, rather than a separation of subject and object. Jung's theory of the "," which bears a certain resemblance to Lévy-Bruhl's theory, enabled him to regard the foundation of mythical images as positive and creative, in contrast with Freud's more negative view of mythology. Jung evolved a theory of . Broadly similar images and symbols occur in myths, fairy tales, and dreams because the human psyche has an inbuilt tendency to dwell on certain inherited motifs (), the basic pattern of which persists, however much details may vary. But critics of Jung have hesitated to accept his theory of archetypes as an account of mythology. Among objections raised, two may be mentioned. First, the archetypal symbols identified by Jung are static, representing personal types that aspects of the personality: they do not help to illuminate—in the way that the analyses of Propp and Burkert do—the patterns of action that myths narrate. Second, Jungian analysis is essentially aimed at relating myth to the individual psyche, whereas myth is above all a social phenomenon, embedded in society and requiring explanation with reference to social structures and social functions.