"Baron Montesquieu: If there was a God of triangles, he would have three sides."
* * *
The arguments proposed in this context by philosophers/theologians who, by pure thought, fell into the infinity pit of causality and deduced that "God exists" are not philosophy, but utopian/fairy-tale concepts that reveal the mythology of their time. Attributing the cause/effect of a necessity to the existence of God is an easy way out, unless one is afraid of the pressure of theist groups in the conditions of the period. If the situation is as it is thought, we no longer need philosophy or theology. Then, what is the reason for the experiments carried out by tens of thousands of scientists, spending billions of dollars over the years, trying to reach the truth? Reaching God? Maybe it's being God...
In my opinion, this 'transcendent' being, which cannot be explained without attributing human characteristics (anthropomorphic) in any way, since the condition for God to be a god is that something that is not a god must exist, is a proposition that should be followed "quietly" in the light of positive sciences.
Belief is the release from the subconscious of the expression "I exist" that comes to life in the imagination/gaining willpower; It has existed since the first human being in the animal kingdom, who gained superiority beyond his physiology, woke up to his own self, and began to question where he came from and where he was going.
At the technological level, no parallelism has been achieved with the teachings of any of the existing beliefs, but each of them contains some similar advice about people's lives under the influence of their own historical process and geography. Like living morally and virtuously. Is there any need for laws or belief for this?
* * *
Human beings do not have self-consciousness from birth until almost 3 years of age; need for care. Same thing after a certain age... Even these reasons make it necessary to form a family unit. There must be a system for hundreds of thousands of families to live together. State structure necessarily comes into play here.
The primary duty of the state is to ensure that households hold together in the strongest possible way. Thus, to create a country that is peaceful within itself and active on a global basis, with the groups it will create in the areas it needs. Therefore, there is no problem in enacting and securing laws for the public benefit in order to create law. However, it is not compulsory to have a belief or to be subject to religious laws.
* * *
Meaning is in everything, meaning is in as much as you can see. Invention has no meaning in form; This is discovery. Invention, in the sense of the word, is creation. For me, its equivalent is agnosticism.
Even if all faith-based judgments are wrong, nature itself exists; Its functioning should be respected and one should act with awareness."Those who display completely negative attitudes towards faith bear the mark of an empty and colorless mind."-G.W.F. Hegel-
YOU ARE READING
LIFE & MEANING
RandomTruth has unlimited space in the imagination. Life; death watch... In the sense of meaning, the life of the mind without consciousness is completely meaningless. It cannot be defined. The focus should be on enriching the statement, not on proof. -Tr...
