The awareness of being subject to a book in the name of adherence to moral values actually encourages people to live in accordance with social consciousness by ignoring the contradictions that may be in its content. Legal sanctions are the concrete reality behind the feeling based on these divine reasons.
During the emergence of religions (and until recent history), the population of the geography in which they were located was the most important component in terms of the authority of the administration. It was considered difficult to have as high a population as possible. Therefore, abortion is seen as wrong by religious circles, simply because of its effect on the increase in the number of people in the household. It is not possible for me to express a clear opinion on this issue, because the changes before and after the period when the embryo acquires a nervous system are still discussed by biologists, and the reasons for those who want to have this done vary widely.
Homosexuality is wrong in religious circles and in my opinion, because it does not contribute to the establishment of the family institution or the society in which it exists, on the contrary, it is a structure that is contrary to the common consciousness. It is a pleasure-oriented deviant behavior that endangers the survival of the species. In cases related to hormonal disorders, it can also be expressed as a disease that needs to be treated.
The spread of LGBT, which seems harmless when viewed individually, to large masses will create chaos. The justifications of any behavior that will cause the family structure to become unprotectable are not greater than the damage it will cause.
Such situations, which are tried to be banned on religious grounds, direct a large number of people towards opposing views just for the sake of opposing religious views. The problems that will be experienced are not divine but human problems, and this chaos should be evaluated not by individuals individually but as a serious spread throughout the society.
Immoral actions are not just clichéd, debatable and simple to name events such as illegal abortion, being an LGBT person, and extramarital affairs, which a large number of people can defend. Attracting the other person to himself just to get attention, to satisfy his ego or to gain any kind of material/moral gain, provoking people when they go outside the circle of their interests and complaining about subsequent events, being with someone else without terminating a relationship that is not based on contractual responsibility, doing anything other than one's own interest in any transaction that concerns the community. not caring about any position to be reached, etc. Events such as these, which usually develop in a chain, are more detailed immoralities that have no explanation or sanction. It is mostly observed in people with problematic personal development, a broken family structure, a blurred past, and unbalanced human relations under the guise of marginality. They are everywhere...
* * *
"Being able to transcend desires and passions requires independence and freedom. What about animals? Animals act only according to their desires and needs. Therefore, they do not have the freedom to obey the moral law." -Immanuel Kant-(Jostein Gaarder - Sophie's World)
YOU ARE READING
LIFE & MEANING
RandomTruth has unlimited space in the imagination. Life; death watch... In the sense of meaning, the life of the mind without consciousness is completely meaningless. It cannot be defined. The focus should be on enriching the statement, not on proof. -Tr...
