Ah, right, this one. I'm pretty sure this one was in fact in junior year. I even remember writing it down, however vaguely.
It refers to a certain someone, if that wasn't clear as day. Let's call them... Aaron.
Definitely one of my longest pieces, in such a way that it breaks from my conventions. And I even started with the piece before the actual title. The title is the fourth line of text intentionally.
And I, somehow, managed to write it so that, embedded within the pattern of "no ending punctuation, comma, period" for each sentence, the lines with no punctuation have their own message. Hence, "we're proving us both ignorant" is also supposed to say "were proving us both ignorant."
This piece, and this line of thought in general, has coloured the contours of my headspace for what may be centuries. I wonder... what good was that? But by now even these resplendent, oft-applied colours are fading and chipping away.
YOU ARE READING
For Posterity: Fundamentals
RandomStupid and weird as it sounds, I forget the meaning in my pieces more often than not, and have to halfheartedly "decide" on a new one until I can remember the original intention - which, of course, can inflate or devalue said original intention and...
