Mahabharata, the largest epic of India, is a treasure for every Indian in its political, moral and spiritual values. The characters and their ups and downs in life, leading to the fatal war of Kurukshetra still draws our interest to know even more a...
As many of you know that I have a book written on Mahabharata which is named "My Story : The Voice of Savyasachi". The book is written from the perspective of third Pandava Arjuna.
Recently Mahabharathian group arranged a contest where my friend KeshavaNandini nominated this book of mine. Today I received a message from Mahabharathian that my book does not deserve to be nominated. No reason was specified.
Our conversation went like this:
Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.
Alright, I apologise for my mistake first. I should not have said so against a particular fan group as you know that I never did so before in public. But I know well that it is some members of that group who do not like Yudhishthira and I guessed one of them arranged the contest and judged my book as well.
I was sure when I received the last comment. I had been judged by the fact that I write "only about a gambler". Well, I know, Yudhishthira haters do call him by that single word, ignoring all his virtues. But can that be a tool to judge my writing? Or me as a person? That too when the book that was nominated is written on Arjuna, not on the said gambler. Was it right for them to insult a member thus?
I want to know your opinion.
I wrote this post to make everything clear about what I faced. Those in my list of followers who still think I am wrong for writing on a gambler, please feel free to unfollow me.
