Ideology Stories

A coherent theory of the rise and fall of civilizations. This essay is neither a policy paper nor a party platform. It does not ask the reader to be a capitalist, a socialist, or anything in between. It asks only one question, and asks it honestly: are the systems we live inside - whatever they are called - serving the dignity of the people inside them? The dual test is simple: Does the system reward creation over extraction? Does it protect the mind as well as the body? If the answer to both is yes, the system is working. If the answer to either is no, then regardless of its label, it has broken faith with the people it governs. The ideas here are not the author's alone. They are drawn from centuries of people who refused to accept that injustice was inevitable - philosophers, economists, poets, scientists, and ordinary citizens who insisted that systems are choices, and that choices can always be made again. They are also drawn from the millions of people posting in subreddits, writing on Substack (substack.com), publishing on Medium (medium.com), arguing on Hacker News (news.ycombinator.com), and building in public on GitHub - the vast, noisy, imperfect commons of the internet, where the next social deal is already being drafted, one commit, one post, one thread at a time. That insistence is the oldest form of hope there is. It is also, in the end, the only one that matters.

In the spiral of the Cold War humanity devoted all its time, effort and technological development into killing the other side. In the wake of peace after the war though, what would come of this technology? Would a gun go back in its case if it had the choice? *No A.I. was used in the writing of this story *This story is unfinished, things will change

When a global experiment to harness new energy goes horribly wrong, millions of people suffer intense headaches. Days later, some individuals begin to develop extraordinary abilities. As these awakened people grapple with their new powers and an ancient ideology, they face an impending government crackdown. The government, aware of the threat, moves quickly to suppress these individuals, setting off a covert conflict. In a world where secrecy is crucial, the struggle for control intensifies, revealing hidden agendas and shifting alliances. The future of humanity hangs in the balance as these events unfold in the shadows.

sometimes I think, sometimes I write down those thoughts, read them here. . .

A compilation of the writings, rituals, and philosophy for the Temple of the Greenwood

This is a philosophical article in which I aim to present the system I created for the world of Willington. If you are curious about Willington and want to learn more about how it works, this is made just for you, as it will provide an overview of the city's ideology while helping you understand the mindset of its inhabitants.

Money has become an essential part of our lives, not only by its natural value but as a destructor to our standards that used to be priceless and sacred. Here is an essay of how money succeeded to buy our principles through a whole planned process put by governments.

The fayhak Ideology

It's 1987. A serial killer that goes by the name 'Shi', went on a killing spree with the aim to dominate the city of London, and become the most dangerous human being the world has ever known. He however, gets interrupted very soon by a group of people which belong to the A.B.I (Alter, Break, Intervene.) Organisation, who's aim is to stop his spree and bring justice to his being.

A basic understanding of my political views.

First contact has been made... but contact with what?

Denver Hayes' book The Architecture of Dehumanization: Anatomy of Global Anti-Cultism analyzes the mechanisms of suppression and dehumanization, highlighting how anti-cult ideology contributes to violence. The author examines examples of repression, including the figure of Alexander Dvorkin in Russia, and warns of the global threat this ideology poses to democratic institutions and human dignity.

A short story depicting the ideologies of two different people with similar experiences, but trying to achieve the same goal using different ways. The question which arises is, which side are you gonna choose in the end?

I have a faun character and I needed a backstory for him which means I needed a world of customs. This is them. Things will be added to each chapter gradually.

*WARNING: This book contains dissociation and heavy subjects like suicide and violence. There will be swearing but it is kept to minimum unless trying to portray anger and irrationality. Cover by me (can be found on @froggian69 on tiktok) In this book, you can experience adventure brought by our unlucky protagonist, Zero. Will they understand how to fix things when in need? Or are they just like the others? Repeating mistakes and reliving horrible moments? Will they notice that time is constructed to punish? To repeat suffering? History has always repeated itself, even in the slightest ways. But everyone bats an eye on it. Using excuses such as "they have different reasons" or "it was just meant to be". Others even go as far as worshipping a nonexistent being. How will Zero cope when finding out the truth? Is One really an enemy or just another part of Zero? Some edgy stuff for my oc because i'm trying to portray them as a complex character but have no idea how to. In this, I will explore different ways to express how they feel. This is an interactive book incase i'm looking for more inspiration. So you, the reader can help make choices. I honestly don't expect anyone to read this but if you do, please enjoy. If you do get inspired by this, please use it, no need for permission but credit me.

«The independence, which is my strength, involves the solitude, which is my weakness» (Pier Paolo Pasolini, "Il Caos") It's though this quote from an article in "Caos" column for the magazine "Il Tempo illustrato" written by Pier Paolo Pasolini, great Italian author, journalist, poet and director, was born my interest about the nature of the independence, in particular for the intellectual one, as inquest instrument on own ideological identity. But all is born by this question: in a society where remains a preexisting characters multiplicity state, how could occur the affirmation of an own individual identity? The answer seems finding in intellectual independence concept and in its in part negative consequence, the solitude. But what is the intellectual independence? And the solitude? And how could we operate though these? With an article series, formulation of my most personal thoughts, already published in my blog Live Thinking (https://livethinking.tumblr.com) I'm going to try suggesting some answers. (Sorry for eventual grammatical errors, I'm not a native speaker)