Chaos and Cupid

7. Rivals in the dark

Vedika left the hospital, feeling a mix of emotions. Her grandmother's words echoed in her mind: "You're strong, Vedika. Don't let anyone bring you down."

As she walked, Vedika's phone buzzed with texts from Saanvi and Aviraj, checking in on her. She smiled, grateful for her friends.

The next day, Vedika attended her Sociology class, determined to focus on studies, not Aarav's campaign. But as she entered the classroom, she spotted Aarav's flyer on the desk.

"Vote for Aarav - Your Voice, Your Leader!" it read.

Vedika rolled her eyes and crumpled the flyer.

Professor Patel began the lecture, discussing social movements. Vedika engaged enthusiastically, participating in discussions.

During the break, Saanvi approached. "Hey, Vedika! Have you thought about joining the debate club?"

Vedika's eyes sparkled. "That's a great idea!"

Aviraj joined them. "Perfect timing! The club's organizing a debate on student leadership."

Vedika grinned mischievously. "Sounds like the perfect opportunity to challenge Aarav's ideas."

The stage was set for a thrilling debate.

*The Heated Debate*

The day of the debate arrived, and the auditorium buzzed with excitement. Vedika and Aarav stood at their respective podiums, confident and determined.

*The Topic*

"Should the University Implement Strict Regulations on Student Organizations?"

*The Debate Begins*

Moderator: "Welcome, Vedika and Aarav. Let's begin. Vedika, you're first."

Vedika: "Thank you. Strict regulations stifle creativity and autonomy. Students should be free to explore and learn without unnecessary constraints."

Aarav: "That's naive, Vedika. Regulations ensure accountability and safety. Without them, chaos reigns."

Vedika: "Accountability doesn't mean suffocating innovation. Students can self-regulate."

Aarav: "Self-regulation fails when interests clash. Regulations protect the majority."

Vedika: "But who decides what's 'protecting' and what's 'stifling'? The administration?"

Aarav: "Experts know better than emotional students."

Vedika: "Experts? You mean those who've never attended this university?"

Aarav: "At least they're impartial."

*The Debate Heats Up*

Vedika: "Impartial? They're disconnected! Students know their needs."

Aarav: "You're just opposing for the sake of opposing."

Vedika: "I'm fighting for student rights, not personal gain."

Aarav: "Rights? You mean the right to anarchic freedom?"

Vedika: "Better than your dictatorial control."

The audience erupted into applause and cheers.

Moderator: "Time's up. Closing statements?"

Vedika: "Regulations should empower, not restrict."

Aarav: "Regulations ensure stability and progress."

The debate concluded, leaving the audience pondering.