Passionate

92 30 4
                                    

Some would always say, "Store not your treasures
upon earth where the weak moth may corrupt."
Ah, but store them where you like, the measures
will decay. I think physics  be abrupt

to rebut your soft-boiled definition
of information as a poem or thought.
Only piss-uselessness they save from nought -
momentum, spin. They won't quite Finnegan*.

I stored deepest treasures mid women's thighs.
My, how we cried and laughed and sluiced all through;
but when it came to bless those beams goodbye,
displeasure biled o'er*, roiled to bitter rue.

I'd do it all again to spite dark fate,
curse my own last breath that makes me late.

......................


*Finnegan's Wake  - I defy Physics to proceed from fundamental forces and gauge  fields - their only ontology - to Finnegan's Wake, step  by step. Eng. Lit. Crit. will live a long time yet, as will all disciplines in their apt domains - Chemistry for one, for starters. In a certain case of supervenience explaining the brain may not explain the mind, and certainly will not explain phenomenological consciousness  - or more crudely, looking locally at magnetic domains may not explain the alignments at large  - and that is true.  I wonder if, somewhere along this para, I might be attempted to be pegged as an idealist?

*'Biled' as in to do with bile and yet an English local slang version of 'boiled'.


















Under The WingsWhere stories live. Discover now