AU Sanses Boyfriend Scenarios (M4F)

A/N: For anyone still asking...

TW: Rant/vent, and possible things that can be taken out of context if the whole thing isn't read.

Also, I mention this in the note, but...

DO NOT ATTACK ANYONE!!

So, this is for anyone still wondering how bruises can show up on bones.

For those unaware, look at the How You Met chapter. In the comments, there is one that says, and I say, paraphrased:

"How has no one commented on the fact he's a skeleton with bruises?! HOW DOES THAT WORK?!?!"

I responded explaining magic skeletons, but then they fired back, again paraphrased (and fixed a spelling error that possibly came from the anger/frustration they felt-):

"I DON'T GIVE A F***!! I RESPECT THROWING LOGIC OUT THE WINDOW BUT THIS IS WHERE I DRAW A F***ING LINE!!"

At this point, I was just frustrated. I gave a long response, basically saying, paraphrased:

"We threw logic out the window with living skeletons, a fish lady who wants to kill you with glowing blue spears, and a goat prince who is dead and his dust mixed with a determination injection created a soulless living flower. If you want realistic, find another book."

And left it at that. I told my dad about the situation, and my mum too. Know what both of them said?

"Bone bruises are a thing."

Now, big thing to answer right of the bat.

Why am I only making this now?

Why didn't I make something earlier?

Because I thought it was done and over. But no. People are still questioning the logic.

Granted, I thought bone bruises weren't possible either. But, I realised that humans and many other creatures can't live with just magic and dust and some form of physical body. So I thought about it, and went:

"Its fantasy. People wouldn't care, and plus, it's not something that comes up very often in this storyline."

But clearly, people care. So, I'm making this just to say the things I had to.

And, one big question I have for the person who originally typed that comment...

Why didn't you answer until way later when someone else took your side?

Anyone can verify this. Checking the dates is the obvious answer to back up what I'm saying.

They responded months later saying the only reason they made that comment was because it was 3am, and their ADHD was acting up.

Now, let me make this clear right off the gate:

I don't have any issue with the explanation itself. It is very possible that is the case and I respect that. As well as I am not making this public when they don't want it to be, as they very clearly posted that comment themselves. Public comment.

I'm not trying to send hate, not trying to say "BURN THEM TO A CRISP!!" I am not saying attack them.

I'm just asking:

If that were the explanation, why only answer months later and not a few days later?

That's all.

I have no issue with the explanation itself. I am not saying anything negative about the explanation itself.

Only the time of which it was posted.