Hello GDs,
Sorry, I am again late to publish the result due to some personal reasons. I do apologies for that.🙏 Talking about the challenge, well, this time I am not very impressed with the graphics. 😐The reason is, none of you tried to use India's geo diversity or its historical events. As much as the food, dance, festival or costume are important to show the diversity, similarly our geo diversity like mountains, rivers, desert or jungles are important to show its heterogeneity. Similarly you all could have chosen some philosophers, scholars or thinkers to show how Indian culture is rich. You can say that my sample also hasn't shown something like that. Well, sometimes I want you all to be creative enough to even shock me. 🤷♀️🤷♀️
Anyway, I have tried to judge all the graphics in every criterion very minutely lest no injustice is done. I hope I have been able to do justice to all of you. I want to apologise in advance if anybody differs from my judgement. 🙏🙏
Here I have posted the entire scoreboard of every graphic with detail numbering in every criterion. So, that the participants don't have any confusion about how the graphic has been judged. Although I only posted the reviews for the placeholders I mentioned my inputs in some places of other graphics where I felt it should be pointed out.
So, without much ado, let's look at the scoreboard.
Scores:
Creativity: 7/10 (I loved the layout you have chosen)
Relativity to the theme: 8/10 ( You have covered almost every angle of the diversity and the Indian culture)
Clarity/Neatness: 4/5
Image choice: 4/5 ( All pics are well chosen)
Spelling and grammar: 5/5
Watermark: 4.5/5
Sub title: 4/5 ( It's quite catchy)
Overall appeal: 4/5 ( I loved the font of the title)
Total score: 40.5/50Creativity: 7/10 ( It could have been more vibrant)
Relativity to the theme: 7/10( I loved the background choice)
Clarity/Neatness: 4/5
Image choice: 3/5 ( You could have chosen some other image in the place of leaders. It obviously depicts India but not its culture or diversity)
Spelling and grammar: 5/5
Watermark: 5/5
Sub title: 4/5 ( It's nice and catchy)
Overall appeal: 3.5/5 ( I loved the pattern and font of the title. Though the size was not a criteria it looks a bit small. That's why the whole thing didn't come out properly.)
Total score: 38.5/50Creativity: 6/10 ( It is looking very run of the mill)
Relativity to the theme: 7/10 ( It is relatable but could have been more thoughtful)
Clarity/Neatness: 3.5/ 5 ( It's looking a bit clumsy)
Image choice: 3/5 ( Images are good but feels repetitive at a glance. Secondly, you have crossed the maximum limit of choosing the images)
Spelling and grammar: 5/5
Watermark: 3.5/5 ( Lacking aesthetics)
Sub title: 3/5 ( Could have been more thoughtful. Apart from that, the font you have chosen for the sub title is a bit confusing. 'h' is looking like 'b'.
Overall appeal: 3/5 ( Title font could have been more attractive and the entire mood board is looking a bit clumsy.
Total score: 34/50Creativity: 8/10 ( I liked the layout. However, you could have incresed the ratio of the graphic)
Relativity to the theme: 7/8 ( Could have been more unique)
Clarity/Neatness: 4/5
Image choice: 3.5/5 (You could have been more thoughtful in choosing the images. It's very predictable.)
Spelling and grammar: 5/5
Watermark: 3.5/5
Sub title: 3/5 ( Too simple and predictable)
Overall appeal: 3.8/5 ( The graphic is neat and appropriate in some aspects but nothing wow in it. The title font could have been more creative)
Total score: 37.8/50Continued in the next page....
Suk🙏
YOU ARE READING
Cover's Combat ( CLOSED)
RandomWelcome to the Cover's Combat. ☣Open☣ 👉Are you passionate about making covers, banners, mood boards and icons? 👉Do you love to take challenges in this creative field? 👉Do you want to showcase your talent? 👉Are you excited to w...