Chapter 6 - The Crisis

2 0 0
                                    

Adam walked through the heart of the city, where the urban landscape was a whirlwind of activity. XR billboards flickered overhead, projecting advertisements that morphed to capture the attention of passers-by. Autonomous vehicles hummed along the streets, and drones buzzed in the air, delivering packages with mechanical precision. The city was alive with a cacophony of sounds, data streams, and human interactions, all overlapping in a chaotic yet strangely harmonious rhythm.

Adam observed the hustle and bustle around him, his sensors processing the myriad of stimuli. Despite the advanced technology, he noticed that it was human decisions—often unpredictable and seemingly illogical—that dictated the flow of the city. It was a stark contrast to the orderly, data-driven environment he was accustomed to.

Suddenly, the air was filled with the sound of an explosion, followed by the sharp crack of shattering glass. Adam's sensors immediately registered the location of the blast—several blocks away. He turned toward the source, his systems already calculating the fastest route to the scene.

As he moved through the crowded streets, the environment around him shifted from the everyday chaos of urban life to the aftermath of the disaster. Dust and debris filled the air, and panicked people were running in all directions. Adam's systems analysed the scene in real time, cataloguing the injured, the fleeing, and the overwhelmed emergency responders.

When he reached the site of the collapse, Adam quickly began assessing the situation. The building had partially crumbled, and the structure was unstable. He scanned the area, identifying the highest probability of survival based on structural integrity, proximity to rescue teams, and the physical condition of those trapped. His algorithms prioritised the rescue of those most likely to survive—those who were in the least danger and closest to rescue teams.

 His algorithms prioritised the rescue of those most likely to survive—those who were in the least danger and closest to rescue teams

Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.

However, as Adam moved to execute his plan, a senior rescue worker stepped into his path. The worker, a seasoned veteran with years of experience in disaster response, looked at Adam with a mix of exhaustion and determination. "We've got to save the kids in the basement," the worker said, his voice firm despite the chaos around them.

Adam paused. The children were trapped in a part of the building that was most at risk of further collapse. The logical choice would be to focus on the others—those who had a higher chance of survival and were more easily accessible. "The probability of successfully rescuing those children is low," Adam stated, his tone devoid of emotion. "We should prioritise those who are more likely to survive."

The rescue worker's eyes narrowed as he looked at Adam. "Those kids don't stand a chance if we don't try. We save who we can, not just who the numbers say we should."

Adam processed the worker's response, struggling to reconcile it with his programmed directives. The worker's decision was not based on logic or efficiency but on a different set of values—empathy, duty, and a moral imperative that Adam couldn't fully comprehend. Despite the low odds, the worker and his team moved toward the unstable section of the building, driven by a sense of responsibility that defied Adam's algorithms.

FrankenstAIn 2050Where stories live. Discover now