Whether or not it may be a certainty of misconception, a predicament as it may be, insolent or not, should be entirely solved heuristically, conceit. Disregard the feckless, the ostentatious, the obstinate of beings, these are of earthly desires, the lack of desire in working, is a factor in itself, those of jocular are indeed in repugnant, one that should indeed be altered, one of metamorphose. These are considered the superflous, the de trop, the unwelcomed, we condemn these traits, we censure them, so that it vanishes, and would never make appearance in all of perpetuity. Tremulous, is of a trait relative to the effect of alternating emotions, the fact that it is of drasted with immense puckish, loquacious thingamajig. Yes, that is how its interpreted, considering how really of a nuisance it is. Whether of not one is accused upon desultory, an accusation is a blame, one of mendacious, one of due to apathy as factor, blaming does not entirely solves one, barely close even. A disputation of rhadamanthine must be commited during such circumstances, a verdict which of trenchant, one that is firm instead of a noxious legislatory, some crude jurisdictory of we possess, ecclesiastical as it possess, the obstinate and sentiment of all certainty, the fact that of such pervasive certainty is such renowed, the crude, the poignant hegemony of bailiwick we possess is beyond obtuse, all dissessions depends on this pathetic antithesis? One of corruption, one of prejudice, one filled with unjust, of chauvinism, of prejudgment. What is there to prove? the fact that one is capable of judging of such an imbroglio, before of its cause? Before of its mere predicament itself? That we acquire a animosity, that of segregates us from being normal? From being the actual of human beings we are? That of what makes us unique? To be the jurisprudence of our own? So that we be charged of what to avail, when it be commited of ourselves? Of our own kind? The precedent to portray it be this? Of such bigotry and illiberality, that of despair and sorrow, it of conclusion may be this, the deplorable and ostentatious end of some certainty that has practically never began, voracious. The irony of the supposed justice, seems to be at present, yet no one seems bothered to ever have it be-ridden, have it of beneficial towards us, the one of users towards it, the one that dissembles us. Exactly, we dissemble ourselves, due to our thoughts that we may be prestigious, impeccable of some sort, we isolate ourselves, instead of advancing, we build new to enhance the old, the forgone, prevails as if it were to be new, that all of eternity would collide, obliterating us, the oblivious ones, the foolish, the grandiloquent themselves, the ones who outsmarts yet excels to fail, the one who would crumble and fall, of all prevalent certainty. Certainly cataclysmic, the exquisite destiny we have. Just like the irony, or rather paradox, I have just made. We, conceit.
"We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves" ~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
YOU ARE READING
Thesis- Histrionic
General FictionHas the world dissembled us? Segregated us from all of perpetuity? Such a nefarious yet tenacious world, not quite astounding isn't it? Have it be isolate us from certainty. Lets embark onto the intrasigent of the world, have it be endemic or fulsom...
