Review #9: Desires For Blood

16 3 0
                                    

A sort of disclaimer for intolerant and butt hurt lads.

I recognize the time and effort of the writer and their dedication towards their work. I don't intend to insult or mock their work in any way. I just intend to give an honest review of how I feel and see the book. My review wouldn't be applicable after they've edited their book, so don't be the dumbass that wages a war about my review being stupid. Definitely contains spoilers.

TITLE: Desires for Blood

Author: @_mochashay_

Title and Cover – {4/10}

The title isn't exactly what it should be

Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.

The title isn't exactly what it should be. It doesn't catch my interest or demand my attention. It is not completely ridiculous but it isn't perfect for the book. I still feel there is a better title for the book somewhere. It can be improved upon.The title can still pass as it seems to have some relevance with the plot, but the cover is at best, shabby.  The cover adds nothing to the story or the reader's experience because there isn't really any creativity involved. It is just a random photo with the title slapped on it. It requires work. I'd suggest being more creative with the title and cover as it does play an integral part in attracting a reader. The book is judged by the cover more often than not.

Blurb/Summary – {1/10}

The blurb presented is inadequate in every aspect and doesn't even fit into any traditional or good format of blurbs.
The summary just consists of a basic one-liner about the idea of the plot and the description of the physical features of the main character, written in the blandest manner. It is not at all written to attract readers and it seems as if no effort was made to write the blurb. The first three lines are warnings which should probably be written at the end of the blurb as they aren't the most inviting for the readers and also because the blurb doesn't talk about anything gruesome, I think they should have been at the end of the blurb.

 The first three lines are warnings which should probably be written at the end of the blurb as they aren't the most inviting for the readers and also because the blurb doesn't talk about anything gruesome, I think they should have been at the end...

Oops! This image does not follow our content guidelines. To continue publishing, please remove it or upload a different image.


The next three lines involve the description which are ridden non-existing abbreviations. The writer hasn't even written the full word 'description'. The description doesn't lead to curiosity or intrigue because it hasn't been worked upon properly.

Alternate Book ReviewsWhere stories live. Discover now