The Mental illness Archives

Part Three: illusions Tempt Reality...

Description: Fighting illusions isn't an inputs proudest moment when trying to flair concerns all over the place, without knowing their limits of how far you're simply willing to "bend the knee" to your own already (overdosing limiting restraints) that's about to break under the EXTREME pressure!

You see everyone... It's not that illusions truly tempt anyone in particular upon their own (supposed) "synchronized" reality or anything like that.... (Thou, I do differ "incredulously" at the volume of ideas that come and go about specifics such as this.) Simply because if you aren't ready to belong to the GREATER reality... Which would obviously be called a certain expression uttered from very disclosed pronunciations that very "rhythmically" don't seem too tolerate a very well-known agreement upon one's very inputs. (Like a good enough challenge that's trying too dramatically "compete" against another challenge "so to speak" in order to feel trapped within the less than simple details that don't relate to the facts very well...at all!) Then that GREATER reality would be called something alone the "impressionable" lines of a "VAST majority"! A VAST majority (part of a very "distinct" visual) that's entirely "full proof" right off the bat. To then be truly "foolproof" (in return) too its own claims at heart. (And what ushers these very claims forward, is that of the inputs themselves.) Input's that don't tolerate (very well between one another's systematic pieces) who process the "verbal and auditory" information that sings like a song bird in the early morning dew. Because sometimes, even if inputs don't "securely" know how to secure its own connections upon a good enough produced sounded out simple broadcasting transmission in the form of a clustering echo full of ricocheting reverberations. That (more or less) would counter the spatial parameters of each other's stationary positions from within this very clustering echo with enough data to become pronounced by enough logic, that it's very inputs would know how to both contextualize and intermingle between each other's very necessary doubts of concern that its very information is officially secured within one another's perimeters. That it would know how to "positively" not become its own concern upon each other's stationary positions that don't know how to tolerate its own limits very well, when such limits have been met with an overdose of extreme tense pressure that simply goes beyond the "practical" limit (at which one's very information could hold at one single time, frequently speaking). (Especially when it's no different when comparing the limits, its very form filled to the brim with "rationalization" towards its own overflowing boundaries of an already ever exceeding more doubtful concern for a good enough moment for issuing a "water under the bridge" understanding that ushers in a plead to counter no more belief's in it's very logical will upon each standpoint that fit's (hopefully towards an undoubtable circulation for "hopeless" failures) when the standard statement grows into an ever-increasingly larger frequency of pleasure among typical belief's that don't seem to either fit well within one another, or can't ever become compared to what rationalizations don't know how to filter out enough of that very information in the sense for pleasure to frequently become some "gentle/kind" force for good.

It does, when it ONLY knows how to differ broadly from the outcome where "actuality" itself becomes the overbearing illusion that sparks tension, (where none hast to really become "privileged" to circulate a single tireless will upon a single communicating and processing unit). A single unit that's already been established by again both a communicating and processing functionality. Because that very unit becomes then tempted by it's very own functionality, that it begins too question the single tireless will upon that unit (that stems directly away from the original stated measurement always hanging at large for ALL too both measure privately...when circulating against an impending rush of pressure that would otherwise completely "distort" one's very will from the actuality)... That is of that very impression of a single illusion, singlehandedly.

That being said, a single illusion can share (appropriately) a single regret from its own communicating will upon the processing acknowledgement of an impending difference without the will to remove an already settled actuality that's already been told of its outcome...simply because an illusion that tempts reality as a whole.